Noise-Aware Generalization: Robustness to In-Domain Noise and Out-of-Domain Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Methods addressing Learning with Noisy Labels (LNL) and multi-source Domain Generalization (DG) use training techniques to improve downstream task performance in the presence of label noise or domain shifts, respectively. Prior work often explores these tasks in isolation, and the limited work that does investigate their intersection, which we refer to as Noise-Aware Generalization (NAG), only benchmarks existing methods without also proposing an approach to reduce its effect. We find that this is likely due, in part, to the new challenges that arise when exploring NAG, which does not appear in LNL or DG alone. For example, we show that the effectiveness of DG methods is compromised in the presence of label noise, making them largely ineffective. Similarly, LNL methods often overfit to easy-to-learn domains as they confuse domain shifts for label noise. Instead, we propose Domain Labels for Noise Detection (DL4ND), the first direct method developed for NAG which uses our observation that noisy samples that may appear indistinguishable within a single domain often show greater variation when compared across domains. We find DL4ND outperforms DG and LNL methods, including their combinations, even when simplifying the NAG challenge by using domain labels to isolate domain shifts from noise. Performance gains up to 12.5% over seven diverse datasets with three noise types demonstrates DL4ND's ability to generalize to a wide variety of settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 71 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2025.
Builds on
71 of 109 references.
References · 71
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
- 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
38 more
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 763
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 623
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 434
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2015Domain Generalization for Object Recognition with Multi-task Autoencoderscited by 253
- 2019Episodic Training for Domain Generalizationcited by 245
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2021Fishr: Invariant Gradient Variances for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 186
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2019Learning to Optimize Domain Specific Normalization for Domain Generalizationcited by 161
- 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
- 2022Domain Generalization by Mutual-Information Regularization with Pre-trained Modelscited by 133
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
- 2021Does Invariant Risk Minimization Capture Invariance?cited by 116
- 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2023Sharpness-Aware Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 102
- 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2021Exploiting Domain-Specific Features to Enhance Domain Generalizationcited by 86
- 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
- 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
- 2022ZIN: When and How to Learn Invariance Without Environment Partition?cited by 58
- 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
- 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
- 2022Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 38
- 2023Understanding and Improving Feature Learning for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 35
50 most cited of 71 All 71 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.