mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing Training-Free Corruption Detection for Object Detection Datasets

arXiv 2606.10666 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Annotation errors are widespread in computer vision datasets and can significantly degrade the performance of systems trained on them, particularly in complex tasks such as object detection. Several approaches exist to identify annotation errors, including training-free feature-space methods which provide a fast and interpretable way to analyze annotations. However, the behavior on object detection annotations, which include semantic and spatial information, remains largely unexplored. In this work we analyze the applicability of feature-space-based approaches for detecting annotation errors in object detection datasets. By adapting an existing feature-space method, we show that such approaches reliably expose semantic mislabel, while positional errors remain difficult to detect. We evaluate this behavior across multiple pretrained embedding models, synthetic noise types (symmetric, asymmetric, and positional), and real-world annotation errors using VOC2012 and KITTI. All code and real-world corruptions are publicly available at the following repository: https://github.com/ ChristianSieberichs/BoundingBoxcorruptiondetection

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 31 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  4. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  5. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  6. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  7. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 58
  8. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  9. 2019Identifying Mislabeled Instances in Classification Datasetscited by 26
  10. 2018Label-Noise Robust Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 22
  11. 2021Understanding Instance-Level Label Noise: Disparate Impacts and Treatmentscited by 22
  12. 2023Identifying Label Errors in Object Detection Datasets by Loss Inspectioncited by 16
8 more
  1. 2023ObjectLab: Automated Diagnosis of Mislabeled Images in Object Detection Datacited by 11
  2. 2023VDC: Versatile Data Cleanser based on Visual-Linguistic Inconsistency by Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 9
  3. 2022Combating noisy labels in object detection datasetscited by 8
  4. 2021On The State of Data In Computer Vision: Human Annotations Remain Indispensable for Developing Deep Learning Modelscited by 6
  5. 2024Label Convergence: Defining an Upper Performance Bound in Object Recognition through Contradictory Annotationscited by 6
  6. 2024An Embedding is Worth a Thousand Noisy Labelscited by 5
  7. 2024Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels by Anchor Hallucination and Hard Sample Label Correctioncited by 1
  8. 2025AutoVDC: Automated Vision Data Cleaning Using Vision-Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.