mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Loss factorization, weakly supervised learning and label noise robustness

arXiv 1602.02450 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2016cs.LG stat.MLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We prove that the empirical risk of most well-known loss functions factors into a linear term aggregating all labels with a term that is label free, and can further be expressed by sums of the loss. This holds true even for non-smooth, non-convex losses and in any RKHS. The first term is a (kernel) mean operator --the focal quantity of this work-- which we characterize as the sufficient statistic for the labels. The result tightens known generalization bounds and sheds new light on their interpretation. Factorization has a direct application on weakly supervised learning. In particular, we demonstrate that algorithms like SGD and proximal methods can be adapted with minimal effort to handle weak supervision, once the mean operator has been estimated. We apply this idea to learning with asymmetric noisy labels, connecting and extending prior work. Furthermore, we show that most losses enjoy a data-dependent (by the mean operator) form of noise robustness, in contrast with known negative results.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2019: 1; 2020: 0; 2021: 6; 2022: 6; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  2. 2023Towards Label-free Scene Understanding by Vision Foundation Modelscited by 54
  3. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  4. 2019Positive-Unlabeled Reward Learningcited by 36
  5. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels by Efficient Transition Matrix Estimation to Combat Label Miscorrectioncited by 20
  6. 2024Enhanced H-Consistency Boundscited by 18
  7. 2023Towards Data-centric Graph Machine Learning: Review and Outlookcited by 15
  8. 2021Analysing the Noise Model Error for Realistic Noisy Label Datacited by 14
  9. 2022DC-Check: A Data-Centric AI checklist to guide the development of reliable machine learning systemscited by 14
  10. 2023Robust Nonparametric Regression under Poisoning Attackcited by 11
  11. 2021Binary classification with corrupted labelscited by 4
  12. 2021Do We Really Need Gold Samples for Sample Weighting Under Label Noise?cited by 3
12 more
  1. 2022Multi-class Label Noise Learning via Loss Decomposition and Centroid Estimationcited by 3
  2. 2022Improving Data Quality with Training Dynamics of Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 3
  3. 2024Multiclass Learning from Noisy Labels for Non-decomposable Performance Measurescited by 3
  4. 2022Bias-Variance Decompositions for Margin Lossescited by 2
  5. 2024Deep Positive-Unlabeled Anomaly Detection for Contaminated Unlabeled Datacited by 2
  6. 2021Exploiting Class Similarity for Machine Learning with Confidence Labels and Projective Loss Functionscited by 1
  7. 2023CSGNN: Conquering Noisy Node labels via Dynamic Class-wise Selectioncited by 1
  8. 2024Robust Learning under Hybrid Noisecited by 1
  9. 2024Skill-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning Acceleration from Heterogeneous Demonstrationscited by 1
  10. 2026Symmetrization of Loss Functions for Robust Training of Neural Networks in the Presence of Noisy Labelscited by 1
  11. 2022Towards Harnessing Feature Embedding for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 0
  12. 2026NCSAM Noise-Compensated Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Noisy Label Learningcited by 0