QMix: Quality-aware Learning with Mixed Noise for Robust Retinal Disease Diagnosis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to the complexity of medical image acquisition and the difficulty of annotation, medical image datasets inevitably contain noise. Noisy data with wrong labels affects the robustness and generalization ability of deep neural networks. Previous noise learning methods mainly considered noise arising from images being mislabeled, i.e. label noise, assuming that all mislabeled images are of high image quality. However, medical images are prone to suffering extreme quality issues, i.e. data noise, where discriminative visual features are missing for disease diagnosis. In this paper, we propose a noise learning framework, termed as QMix, that learns a robust disease diagnosis model under mixed noise. QMix alternates between sample separation and quality-aware semisupervised training in each training epoch. In the sample separation phase, we design a joint uncertainty-loss criterion to effectively separate (1) correctly labeled images; (2) mislabeled images with high quality and (3) mislabeled images with low quality. In the semi-supervised training phase, we train a disease diagnosis model to learn robust feature representation from the separated samples. Specifically, we devise a sample-reweighing loss to mitigate the effect of mislabeled images with low quality during training. Meanwhile, a contrastive enhancement loss is proposed to further distinguish mislabeled images with low quality from correctly labeled images. QMix achieved state-of-the-art disease diagnosis performance on five public retinal image datasets and exhibited substantial improvement on robustness against mixed noise.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2024.
Builds on
31 of 53 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
19 more
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
- 2019Evaluation of Retinal Image Quality Assessment Networks in Different Color-spacescited by 57
- 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
- 2019Robust Learning at Noisy Labeled Medical Images: Applied to Skin Lesion Classificationcited by 33
- 2020Salvage Reusable Samples from Noisy Data for Robust Learningcited by 19
- 2022Cross-Field Transformer for Diabetic Retinopathy Grading on Two-field Fundus Imagescited by 9
- 2023Improving Medical Image Classification in Noisy Labels Using Only Self-supervised Pretrainingcited by 8
- 2020Which Strategies Matter for Noisy Label Classification? Insight into Loss and Uncertaintycited by 5
- 2024PLReMix: Combating Noisy Labels with Pseudo-Label Relaxed Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025A Versatile Pathology Co-pilot via Reasoning Enhanced Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 12
- 2025Benchmarking Real-World Medical Image Classification with Noisy Labels: Challenges, Practice, and Outlookcited by 3
- 2025Modular Transformer Architecture for Precision Agriculture Imagingcited by 0
- 2025Solutions for Mitotic Figure Detection and Atypical Classification in MIDOG 2025cited by 0
- 2026Learning to Fuse and Reconstruct Multi-View Graphs for Diabetic Retinopathy Gradingcited by 0
- 2026Learning to Fuse and Reconstruct Multi-View Graphs for Diabetic Retinopathy Grading25 Feb 2026
- 2025Benchmarking Real-World Medical Image Classification with Noisy Labels: Challenges, Practice, and Outlook10 Dec 2025
- 2025Solutions for Mitotic Figure Detection and Atypical Classification in MIDOG 202529 Aug 2025
- 2025Modular Transformer Architecture for Precision Agriculture Imaging4 Aug 2025
- 2025A Versatile Pathology Co-pilot via Reasoning Enhanced Multimodal Large Language Model23 Jul 2025