ProSelfLC: Progressive Self Label Correction Towards A Low-Temperature Entropy State
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is a family of label modification approaches including self and non-self label correction (LC), and output regularisation. They are widely used for training robust deep neural networks (DNNs), but have not been mathematically and thoroughly analysed together. We study them and discover three key issues: (1) We are more interested in adopting Self LC as it leverages its own knowledge and requires no auxiliary models. However, it is unclear how to adaptively trust a learner as the training proceeds. (2) Some methods penalise while the others reward low-entropy (i.e., high-confidence) predictions, prompting us to ask which one is better. (3) Using the standard training setting, a learned model becomes less confident when severe noise exists. Self LC using high-entropy knowledge would generate high-entropy targets. To resolve the issue (1), inspired by a well-accepted finding, i.e., deep neural networks learn meaningful patterns before fitting noise, we propose a novel end-to-end method named ProSelfLC, which is designed according to the learning time and prediction entropy. Concretely, for any data point, we progressively and adaptively trust its predicted probability distribution versus its annotated one if a network has been trained for a relatively long time and the prediction is of low entropy. For the issue (2), the effectiveness of ProSelfLC defends entropy minimisation. By ProSelfLC, we empirically prove that it is more effective to redefine a semantic low-entropy state and optimise the learner toward it. To address the issue (3), we decrease the entropy of self knowledge using a low temperature before exploiting it to correct labels, so that the revised labels redefine low-entropy target probability distributions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ProSelfLC through extensive experiments in both clean and noisy settings, and on both image and protein datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 69 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2022.
Builds on
69 of 115 references.
References · 69
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
38 more
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2017Deep Mutual Learningcited by 621
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 539
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2019Be Your Own Teacher: Improve the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Self Distillationcited by 491
- 2013Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?cited by 466
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2014Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embeddingcited by 287
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2018Deep Co-Training for Semi-Supervised Image Recognitioncited by 145
- 2020Regularizing Class-wise Predictions via Self-knowledge Distillationcited by 144
- 2020Knowledge Distillation Meets Self-Supervisioncited by 142
- 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
- 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
- 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
- 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
50 most cited of 69 All 69 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation with Source Label Adaptationcited by 26
- 2023Survey on Leveraging Uncertainty Estimation Towards Trustworthy Deep Neural Networks: The Case of Reject Option and Post-training Processingcited by 6
- 2024How to Learn in a Noisy World? Self-Correcting the Real-World Data Noise in Machine Translationcited by 4
- 2025Enhancing Sample Selection Against Label Noise by Cutting Mislabeled Easy Examplescited by 4
- 2026Efficient Content-based Recommendation Model Training via Noise-aware Coreset Selectioncited by 0
- 2026Efficient Content-based Recommendation Model Training via Noise-aware Coreset Selection15 Jan 2026
- 2025Enhancing Sample Selection Against Label Noise by Cutting Mislabeled Easy Examples12 Feb 2025
- 2024How to Learn in a Noisy World? Self-Correcting the Real-World Data Noise in Machine Translation2 Jul 2024
- 2023Survey on Leveraging Uncertainty Estimation Towards Trustworthy Deep Neural Networks: The Case of Reject Option and Post-training Processing11 Apr 2023
- 2023Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation with Source Label Adaptation5 Feb 2023