mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PASS: Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection for training with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2303.10802 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2023cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The prevalence of noisy-label samples poses a significant challenge in deep learning, inducing overfitting effects. This has, therefore, motivated the emergence of learning with noisy-label (LNL) techniques that focus on separating noisy- and clean-label samples to apply different learning strategies to each group of samples. Current methodologies often rely on the small-loss hypothesis or feature-based selection to separate noisy- and clean-label samples, yet our empirical observations reveal their limitations, especially for labels with instance dependent noise (IDN). An important characteristic of IDN is the difficulty to distinguish the clean-label samples that lie near the decision boundary (i.e., the hard samples) from the noisy-label samples. We, therefore, propose a new noisy-label detection method, termed Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection (PASS), to address this problem. Utilising a trio of classifiers, PASS employs consensus-driven peer-based agreement of two models to select the samples to train the remaining model. PASS is easily integrated into existing LNL models, enabling the improvement of the detection accuracy of noisy- and clean-label samples, which increases the classification accuracy across various LNL benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2023.

Builds on

55 of 105 references.

References · 55

  1. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  4. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  5. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  6. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  7. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  8. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  9. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  10. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  11. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  12. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
38 more
  1. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  2. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  3. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  4. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  5. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  6. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  7. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  8. 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
  9. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  10. 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 159
  11. 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
  12. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  13. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  14. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  15. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  16. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  17. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  18. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  19. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  20. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  21. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  22. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  23. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  24. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
  25. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  26. 2021Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning under a Structural Causal Modelcited by 50
  27. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  28. 2018Deep Bilevel Learningcited by 48
  29. 2021Risk Bounds for Over-parameterized Maximum Margin Classification on Sub-Gaussian Mixturescited by 48
  30. 2022Label Matching Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 44
  31. 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
  32. 2021Faster Meta Update Strategy for Noise-Robust Deep Learningcited by 38
  33. 2021Boosting Co-teaching with Compression Regularization for Label Noisecited by 31
  34. 2020Weakly Supervised Learning with Side Information for Noisy Labeled Imagescited by 30
  35. 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
  36. 2022Jigsaw-ViT: Learning Jigsaw Puzzles in Vision Transformercited by 21
  37. 2017Network structure from rich but noisy datacited by 17
  38. 2021PropMix: Hard Sample Filtering and Proportional MixUp for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 17

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.