mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trusted Multi-view Learning under Noisy Supervision

arXiv 2404.11944 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2024cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-view learning methods often focus on improving decision accuracy while neglecting the decision uncertainty, which significantly restricts their applications in safety-critical scenarios. To address this, trusted multi-view learning methods estimate prediction uncertainties by learning class distributions from each instance. However, these methods heavily rely on high quality ground-truth labels. This motivates us to delve into a new problem: how to develop a reliable multi-view learning model under the guidance of noisy labels? We propose the Trusted Multi view Noise Refining (TMNR) method to address this challenge by modeling label noise arising from low-quality data features and easily-confused classes. TMNR employs evidential deep neural networks to construct view-specific opinions that capture both beliefs and uncertainty. These opinions are then transformed through noise correlation matrices to align with the noisy supervision, where matrix elements are constrained by sample uncertainty to reflect label reliability. Furthermore, considering the challenge of jointly optimizing the evidence network and noise correlation matrices under noisy supervision, we further propose Trusted Multi-view Noise Re-Refining (TMNR^2 ), which disentangles this complex co-training problem by establishing different training objectives for distinct modules. TMNR^2 identifies potentially mislabeled samples through evidence-label consistency and generates pseudo-labels from neighboring information. By assigning clean samples to optimize evidential networks and noisy samples to guide noise correlation matrices, respectively, TMNR^2 reduces mapping interference and achieves stabilizes training. Experimental results demonstrate that TMNR^2 significantly outperforms baseline methods, with average accuracy improvements of 7% on datasets with 50% label noise.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2024.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
  3. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  4. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
  5. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  6. 2022Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusioncited by 167
  7. 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
  8. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  9. 2021Trusted Multi-View Classificationcited by 94
  10. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  11. 2023Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learningcited by 58
  12. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
6 more
  1. 2024Reliable Conflictive Multi-View Learningcited by 45
  2. 2022A Survey on Incomplete Multi-view Clusteringcited by 31
  3. 2023Information Recovery-Driven Deep Incomplete Multiview Clustering Networkcited by 16
  4. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty for Incomplete Multi-View Classificationcited by 13
  5. 2023Virtual Category Learning: A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for Dense Prediction with Extremely Limited Labelscited by 10
  6. 2020BERTERS: Multimodal Representation Learning for Expert Recommendation System with Transformercited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

8 papers.