mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards

arXiv 1805.03677 ↗First posted 9 May 2018cs.DB cs.CYcited by 97

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems built on incomplete or biased data will often exhibit problematic outcomes. Current methods of data analysis, particularly before model development, are costly and not standardized. The Dataset Nutrition Label (the Label) is a diagnostic framework that lowers the barrier to standardized data analysis by providing a distilled yet comprehensive overview of dataset "ingredients" before AI model development. Building a Label that can be applied across domains and data types requires that the framework itself be flexible and adaptable; as such, the Label is comprised of diverse qualitative and quantitative modules generated through multiple statistical and probabilistic modelling backends, but displayed in a standardized format. To demonstrate and advance this concept, we generated and published an open source prototype with seven sample modules on the ProPublica Dollars for Docs dataset. The benefits of the Label are manyfold. For data specialists, the Label will drive more robust data analysis practices, provide an efficient way to select the best dataset for their purposes, and increase the overall quality of AI models as a result of more robust training datasets and the ability to check for issues at the time of model development. For those building and publishing datasets, the Label creates an expectation of explanation, which will drive better data collection practices. We also explore the limitations of the Label, including the challenges of generalizing across diverse datasets, and the risk of using "ground truth" data as a comparison dataset. We discuss ways to move forward given the limitations identified. Lastly, we lay out future directions for the Dataset Nutrition Label project, including research and public policy agendas to further advance consideration of the concept.

Key facts. Cited by 97 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 May 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 28; 2022: 21; 2023: 13; 2024: 19; 2025: 7; 2026: 9.

97 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasetscited by 241
  2. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  3. 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 129
  4. 2023AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmapcited by 119
  5. 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
  6. 2021NaturalProofs: Mathematical Theorem Proving in Natural Languagecited by 80
  7. 2024Croissant: A Metadata Format for ML-Ready Datasetscited by 79
  8. 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotationcited by 59
  9. 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
  10. 2021Whose Ground Truth? Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Dataset Annotationcited by 51
  11. 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
  12. 2021Addressing "Documentation Debt" in Machine Learning Research: A Retrospective Datasheet for BookCorpuscited by 46
38 more
  1. 2023xCodeEval: A Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrievalcited by 46
  2. 2021A Statutory Article Retrieval Dataset in Frenchcited by 40
  3. 2023Analyzing Dataset Annotation Quality Management in the Wildcited by 39
  4. 2022Gender Artifacts in Visual Datasetscited by 38
  5. 2022Towards Transparency in Dermatology Image Datasets with Skin Tone Annotations by Experts, Crowds, and an Algorithmcited by 35
  6. 2023Interpretable Long-Form Legal Question Answering with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 35
  7. 2022Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkitscited by 33
  8. 2022Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desideratacited by 28
  9. 2024Navigating Dataset Documentations in AI: A Large-Scale Analysis of Dataset Cards on Hugging Facecited by 27
  10. 2021Outlining Traceability: A Principle for Operationalizing Accountability in Computing Systemscited by 26
  11. 2022The Dataset Nutrition Label (2nd Gen): Leveraging Context to Mitigate Harms in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
  12. 2021"Garbage In, Garbage Out" Revisited: What Do Machine Learning Application Papers Report About Human-Labeled Training Data?cited by 24
  13. 2021Reusable Templates and Guides For Documenting Datasets and Models for Natural Language Processing and Generation: A Case Study of the HuggingFace and GEM Data and Model Cardscited by 24
  14. 2022Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate modelscited by 23
  15. 2021Machine Learning Practices Outside Big Tech: How Resource Constraints Challenge Responsible Developmentcited by 21
  16. 2021Characterizing and Detecting Mismatch in Machine-Learning-Enabled Systemscited by 19
  17. 2021Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulationcited by 19
  18. 2022Symphony: Composing Interactive Interfaces for Machine Learningcited by 18
  19. 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
  20. 2024Data Readiness for AI: A 360-Degree Surveycited by 15
  21. 2024Public Domain 12M: A Highly Aesthetic Image-Text Dataset with Novel Governance Mechanismscited by 15
  22. 2021A Review of Bangla Natural Language Processing Tasks and the Utility of Transformer Modelscited by 13
  23. 2021Explainability Is in the Mind of the Beholder: Establishing the Foundations of Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 13
  24. 2024The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic reviewcited by 13
  25. 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systemscited by 12
  26. 2021Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?cited by 11
  27. 2022Documenting Geographically and Contextually Diverse Data Sources: The BigScience Catalogue of Language Data and Resourcescited by 11
  28. 2023Ground Truth Or Dare: Factors Affecting The Creation Of Medical Datasets For Training AIcited by 11
  29. 2024What's documented in AI? Systematic Analysis of 32K AI Model Cardscited by 10
  30. 2024Co-designing an AI Impact Assessment Report Template with AI Practitioners and AI Compliance Expertscited by 10
  31. 2021Confounding Tradeoffs for Neural Network Quantizationcited by 9
  32. 2021SoK: Machine Learning Governancecited by 9
  33. 2024Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approachescited by 9
  34. 2024BenchmarkCards: Standardized Documentation for Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 8
  35. 2025Eval Factsheets: A Structured Framework for Documenting AI Evaluationscited by 8
  36. 2021Detecting discriminatory risk through data annotation based on Bayesian inferencescited by 7
  37. 2021Responsible and Regulatory Conform Machine Learning for Medicine: A Survey of Challenges and Solutionscited by 7
  38. 2022Prescriptive and Descriptive Approaches to Machine-Learning Transparencycited by 7

50 most cited of 97 All 97 (JSON)