What's documented in AI? Systematic Analysis of 32K AI Model Cards
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid proliferation of AI models has underscored the importance of thorough documentation, as it enables users to understand, trust, and effectively utilize these models in various applications. Although developers are encouraged to produce model cards, it's not clear how much information or what information these cards contain. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of 32,111 AI model documentations on Hugging Face, a leading platform for distributing and deploying AI models. Our investigation sheds light on the prevailing model card documentation practices. Most of the AI models with substantial downloads provide model cards, though the cards have uneven informativeness. We find that sections addressing environmental impact, limitations, and evaluation exhibit the lowest filled-out rates, while the training section is the most consistently filled-out. We analyze the content of each section to characterize practitioners' priorities. Interestingly, there are substantial discussions of data, sometimes with equal or even greater emphasis than the model itself. To evaluate the impact of model cards, we conducted an intervention study by adding detailed model cards to 42 popular models which had no or sparse model cards previously. We find that adding model cards is moderately correlated with an increase weekly download rates. Our study opens up a new perspective for analyzing community norms and practices for model documentation through large-scale data science and linguistics analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.
Builds on
22 of 57 references.
References · 22
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
- 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
- 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 163
10 more
- 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
- 2021Disparities in Dermatology AI: Assessments Using Diverse Clinical Imagescited by 132
- 2017Accelerated Hierarchical Density Clusteringcited by 100
- 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
- 2022MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training Conflictscited by 81
- 2022The Dataset Nutrition Label (2nd Gen): Leveraging Context to Mitigate Harms in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
- 2020Value Cards: An Educational Toolkit for Teaching Social Impacts of Machine Learning through Deliberationcited by 24
- 2021Reusable Templates and Guides For Documenting Datasets and Models for Natural Language Processing and Generation: A Case Study of the HuggingFace and GEM Data and Model Cardscited by 24
- 2019ABOUT ML: Annotation and Benchmarking on Understanding and Transparency of Machine Learning Lifecyclescited by 13
- 2020What Makes a Popular Academic AI Repository?cited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systemscited by 42
- 2024Acceptable Use Policies for Foundation Modelscited by 12
- 2025Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluationscited by 4
- 2024Model Lakescited by 2
- 2025Model Lake: a New Alternative for Machine Learning Models Management and Governancecited by 1
- 2024Criterion Collapse and Loss Distribution Controlcited by 0
- 2025AI Transparency Atlas: Framework, Scoring, and Real-Time Model Card Evaluation Pipelinecited by 0
- 2026Ethical and Technical Limits of Deepfake Speech Datasetscited by 0
- 2026Workflow Cards: Structured Summaries of Workflow Executions Using Provenance Datacited by 0
- 2026Automatic Model Card Generation Using an LLMcited by 0
- 2026Automatic Model Card Generation Using an LLM25 Aug 2026
- 2026Workflow Cards: Structured Summaries of Workflow Executions Using Provenance Data11 Aug 2026
- 2026Ethical and Technical Limits of Deepfake Speech Datasets9 Jun 2026
- 2025AI Transparency Atlas: Framework, Scoring, and Real-Time Model Card Evaluation Pipeline13 Dec 2025
- 2025Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations6 Nov 2025
- 2025Model Lake: a New Alternative for Machine Learning Models Management and Governance27 Mar 2025
- 2025Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems7 Mar 2025
- 2024Acceptable Use Policies for Foundation Models29 Aug 2024
- 2024Model Lakes4 Mar 2024
- 2024Criterion Collapse and Loss Distribution Control15 Feb 2024