mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prescriptive and Descriptive Approaches to Machine-Learning Transparency

arXiv 2204.13582 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2022cs.SE cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Specialized documentation techniques have been developed to communicate key facts about machine-learning (ML) systems and the datasets and models they rely on. Techniques such as Datasheets, FactSheets, and Model Cards have taken a mainly descriptive approach, providing various details about the system components. While the above information is essential for product developers and external experts to assess whether the ML system meets their requirements, other stakeholders might find it less actionable. In particular, ML engineers need guidance on how to mitigate potential shortcomings in order to fix bugs or improve the system's performance. We survey approaches that aim to provide such guidance in a prescriptive way. We further propose a preliminary approach, called Method Cards, which aims to increase the transparency and reproducibility of ML systems by providing prescriptive documentation of commonly-used ML methods and techniques. We showcase our proposal with an example in small object detection, and demonstrate how Method Cards can communicate key considerations for model developers. We further highlight avenues for improving the user experience of ML engineers based on Method Cards.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2022.

Builds on

18 of 52 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  3. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  4. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  6. 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
  7. 2020Rethinking Pre-training and Self-trainingcited by 352
  8. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  9. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  10. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  11. 2019A Step Toward Quantifying Independently Reproducible Machine Learning Researchcited by 77
  12. 2021On Aliased Resizing and Surprising Subtleties in GAN Evaluationcited by 51
6 more
  1. 2020Mind the Pad -- CNNs can Develop Blind Spotscited by 41
  2. 2022The Dataset Nutrition Label (2nd Gen): Leveraging Context to Mitigate Harms in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
  3. 2019Studying Software Engineering Patterns for Designing Machine Learning Systemscited by 24
  4. 2019Experiences with Improving the Transparency of AI Models and Servicescited by 14
  5. 2019ABOUT ML: Annotation and Benchmarking on Understanding and Transparency of Machine Learning Lifecyclescited by 13
  6. 2021Perspectives on Machine Learning from Psychology's Reproducibility Crisiscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.