mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SoK: Machine Learning Governance

arXiv 2109.10870 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021cs.CR cs.LG cs.SEcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The application of machine learning (ML) in computer systems introduces not only many benefits but also risks to society. In this paper, we develop the concept of ML governance to balance such benefits and risks, with the aim of achieving responsible applications of ML. Our approach first systematizes research towards ascertaining ownership of data and models, thus fostering a notion of identity specific to ML systems. Building on this foundation, we use identities to hold principals accountable for failures of ML systems through both attribution and auditing. To increase trust in ML systems, we then survey techniques for developing assurance, i.e., confidence that the system meets its security requirements and does not exhibit certain known failures. This leads us to highlight the need for techniques that allow a model owner to manage the life cycle of their system, e.g., to patch or retire their ML system. Put altogether, our systematization of knowledge standardizes the interactions between principals involved in the deployment of ML throughout its life cycle. We highlight opportunities for future work, e.g., to formalize the resulting game between ML principals.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 187 of its 320 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

187 of 320 references.

References · 187

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  7. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  8. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  9. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  10. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  11. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  12. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
38 more
  1. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  5. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
  6. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  7. 2019Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalizationcited by 1,299
  8. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
  9. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
  10. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  11. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  12. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
  13. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
  14. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  15. 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
  16. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
  17. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  18. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  19. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  20. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  21. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  22. 2019Image2StyleGAN: How to Embed Images Into the StyleGAN Latent Space?cited by 675
  23. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  24. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  25. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  26. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
  27. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 618
  28. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  29. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  30. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
  31. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
  32. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  33. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 519
  34. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  35. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
  36. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  37. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 486
  38. 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 484

50 most cited of 187 All 187 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

10 papers.