mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Outlining Traceability: A Principle for Operationalizing Accountability in Computing Systems

arXiv 2101.09385 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2021cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accountability is widely understood as a goal for well governed computer systems, and is a sought-after value in many governance contexts. But how can it be achieved? Recent work on standards for governable artificial intelligence systems offers a related principle: traceability. Traceability requires establishing not only how a system worked but how it was created and for what purpose, in a way that explains why a system has particular dynamics or behaviors. It connects records of how the system was constructed and what the system did mechanically to the broader goals of governance, in a way that highlights human understanding of that mechanical operation and the decision processes underlying it. We examine the various ways in which the principle of traceability has been articulated in AI principles and other policy documents from around the world, distill from these a set of requirements on software systems driven by the principle, and systematize the technologies available to meet those requirements. From our map of requirements to supporting tools, techniques, and procedures, we identify gaps and needs separating what traceability requires from the toolbox available for practitioners. This map reframes existing discussions around accountability and transparency, using the principle of traceability to show how, when, and why transparency can be deployed to serve accountability goals and thereby improve the normative fidelity of systems and their development processes.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 254 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2021.

Builds on

30 of 254 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  3. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  5. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  6. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  7. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  8. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  9. 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 299
  10. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  11. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 163
  12. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 134
18 more
  1. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  2. 2018'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisionscited by 91
  3. 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
  4. 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
  5. 2019"The Human Body is a Black Box": Supporting Clinical Decision-Making with Deep Learningcited by 39
  6. 2014An introduction to Docker for reproducible research, with examples from the R environmentcited by 25
  7. 2017Measuring Personalization of Web Searchcited by 20
  8. 2020Extending the Machine Learning Abstraction Boundary: A Complex Systems Approach to Incorporate Societal Contextcited by 18
  9. 2018Enslaving the Algorithm: From a "Right to an Explanation" to a "Right to Better Decisions"?cited by 14
  10. 2017Developing Bug-Free Machine Learning Systems With Formal Mathematicscited by 13
  11. 2015YesWorkflow: A User-Oriented, Language-Independent Tool for Recovering Workflow Information from Scriptscited by 4
  12. 2017Does mitigating ML's impact disparity require treatment disparity?cited by 3
  13. 2018Automated Verification of Accountability in Security Protocolscited by 3
  14. 2018Operationalizing Conflict and Cooperation between Automated Software Agents in Wikipedia: A Replication and Expansion of 'Even Good Bots Fight'cited by 2
  15. 2019An Algorithmic Equity Toolkit for Technology Audits by Community Advocates and Activistscited by 2
  16. 2014Assumptions Underlying Agile Software Development Processescited by 1
  17. 2016Fairness as a Program Propertycited by 1
  18. 2017Logics and practices of transparency and opacity in real-world applications of public sector machine learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 9.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Accountability in an Algorithmic Society: Relationality, Responsibility, and Robustness in Machine Learningcited by 47
  2. 2023Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chainscited by 39
  3. 2023From Google Gemini to OpenAI Q* (Q-Star): A Survey of Reshaping the Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Landscapecited by 18
  4. 2023Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"cited by 15
  5. 2022The Conflict Between Explainable and Accountable Decision-Making Algorithmscited by 13
  6. 2022System Cards for AI-Based Decision-Making for Public Policycited by 11
  7. 2024Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 9
  8. 2024From Silos to Systems: Process-Oriented Hazard Analysis for AI Systemscited by 6
  9. 2023A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and Responsible AIcited by 5
  10. 2025Accountability Capture: How Record-Keeping to Support AI Transparency and Accountability (Re)shapes Algorithmic Oversightcited by 5
  11. 2025Measuring What Matters: Connecting AI Ethics Evaluations to System Attributes, Hazards, and Harmscited by 5
  12. 2025Fine-Grained Appropriate Reliance: Human-AI Collaboration with a Multi-Step Transparent Decision Workflow for Complex Task Decompositioncited by 3
14 more
  1. 2021Accountability in AI: From Principles to Industry-specific Accreditationcited by 2
  2. 2025TechOps: Technical Documentation Templates for the AI Actcited by 2
  3. 2025Accountability Framework for Healthcare AI Systems: Towards Joint Accountability in Decision Makingcited by 2
  4. 2024From Model Performance to Claim: How a Change of Focus in Machine Learning Replicability Can Help Bridge the Responsibility Gapcited by 1
  5. 2025AI Model Passport: Data and System Traceability Framework for Transparent AI in Healthcited by 1
  6. 2026"Is This Not Enough?": Asymmetries in Institutional Accountability and Collective Sensemaking in the Case of Canada's Algorithmic Visa Triage Systemcited by 1
  7. 2026JustDiag!: A Diagnostic Justification Engine for Accountable Root Cause Analysiscited by 1
  8. 2026AdaQE-CG: Adaptive Query Expansion for Web-Scale Generative AI Model and Data Card Generationcited by 0
  9. 2026Bureaucratic Silences: What the Canadian AI Register Reveals, Omits, and Obscurescited by 0
  10. 2026Beyond Post-hoc Explanation: Toward Glassbox AI via Probabilistic Mediationcited by 0
  11. 2026Security and Privacy in Agentic AI: Grand Challenges and Future Directionscited by 0
  12. 2026Unsafe at any AUC: Unlearned Lessons from Sociotechnical Disasters for Responsible AIcited by 0
  13. 2026Designing an Auditable LLM-Supported Workflow for Qualitative Thematic Analysiscited by 0
  14. 2026A Global Comparison of Schemas, Transparency, and Interoperability in Public-Sector AI Registers and Inventoriescited by 0