mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Compliance Cards: Automated EU AI Act Compliance Analyses amidst a Complex AI Supply Chain

arXiv 2406.14758 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the AI supply chain grows more complex, AI systems and models are increasingly likely to incorporate multiple internally- or externally-sourced components such as datasets and (pre-trained) models. In such cases, determining whether or not the aggregate AI system or model complies with the EU AI Act (AIA) requires a multi-step process in which compliance-related information about both the AI system or model and all its component parts is: (1) gathered, potentially from multiple arms-length sources; (2) harmonized, if necessary; (3) inputted into an analysis that looks across all of it to render a compliance prediction. Because this process is so complex and time-consuming, it threatens to overburden the limited compliance resources of the AI providers (i.e., developers) who bear much of the responsibility for complying with the AIA. It also renders rapid or real-time compliance analyses infeasible in many AI development scenarios where they would be beneficial to providers. To address these shortcomings, we introduce a complete system for automating provider-side AIA compliance analyses amidst a complex AI supply chain. This system has two key elements. First is an interlocking set of computational, multi-stakeholder transparency artifacts that capture AIA-specific metadata about both: (1) the provider's overall AI system or model; and (2) the datasets and pre-trained models it incorporates as components. Second is an algorithm that operates across all those artifacts to render a real-time prediction about whether or not the aggregate AI system or model complies with the AIA. All told, this system promises to dramatically facilitate and democratize provider-side AIA compliance analyses (and, perhaps by extension, provider-side AIA compliance).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 79 references.

References · 30

  1. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  3. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  5. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
  6. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
  7. 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
  8. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  9. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  10. 2024OpenELM: An Efficient Language Model Family with Open Training and Inference Frameworkcited by 75
  11. 2021Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Surveycited by 69
  12. 2019Dataset search: a surveycited by 36
18 more
  1. 2024Navigating Dataset Documentations in AI: A Large-Scale Analysis of Dataset Cards on Hugging Facecited by 27
  2. 2022The Dataset Nutrition Label (2nd Gen): Leveraging Context to Mitigate Harms in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
  3. 2020Value Cards: An Educational Toolkit for Teaching Social Impacts of Machine Learning through Deliberationcited by 24
  4. 2022The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI marketcited by 18
  5. 2024The AI Community Building the Future? A Quantitative Analysis of Development Activity on Hugging Face Hubcited by 18
  6. 2024Verifiable evaluations of machine learning models using zkSNARKscited by 16
  7. 2023Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Actcited by 15
  8. 2024Federated Learning Priorities Under the European Union Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 13
  9. 2018Helix: Holistic Optimization for Accelerating Iterative Machine Learningcited by 11
  10. 2024What do we know about Hugging Face? A systematic literature review and quantitative validation of qualitative claimscited by 9
  11. 2022On Continuous Integration / Continuous Delivery for Automated Deployment of Machine Learning Models using MLOpscited by 8
  12. 2020Golden Grain: Building a Secure and Decentralized Model Marketplace for MLaaScited by 7
  13. 2022Prescriptive and Descriptive Approaches to Machine-Learning Transparencycited by 7
  14. 2023Open Datasheets: Machine-readable Documentation for Open Datasets and Responsible AI Assessmentscited by 7
  15. 2023Model Reporting for Certifiable AI: A Proposal from Merging EU Regulation into AI Developmentcited by 6
  16. 2022Evaluating a Methodology for Increasing AI Transparency: A Case Studycited by 3
  17. 2019Quantifying Transparency of Machine Learning Systems through Analysis of Contributionscited by 2
  18. 2024Explainability in JupyterLab and Beyond: Interactive XAI Systems for Integrated and Collaborative Workflowscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.