mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computing

arXiv 2109.04270 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 129

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most Artificial Intelligence applications are based on supervised machine learning (ML), which ultimately grounds on manually annotated data. The annotation process is often performed in terms of a majority vote and this has been proved to be often problematic, as highlighted by recent studies on the evaluation of ML models. In this article we describe and advocate for a different paradigm, which we call data perspectivism, which moves away from traditional gold standard datasets, towards the adoption of methods that integrate the opinions and perspectives of the human subjects involved in the knowledge representation step of ML processes. Drawing on previous works which inspired our proposal we describe the potential of our proposal for not only the more subjective tasks (e.g. those related to human language) but also to tasks commonly understood as objective (e.g. medical decision making), and present the main advantages of adopting a perspectivist stance in ML, as well as possible disadvantages, and various ways in which such a stance can be implemented in practice. Finally, we share a set of recommendations and outline a research agenda to advance the perspectivist stance in ML.

Key facts. Cited by 129 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2021.

Builds on

15 of 93 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  3. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 329
  4. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 259
  5. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  6. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 117
  7. 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
  8. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  9. 2017Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classificationcited by 77
  10. 2019Let's agree to disagree: learning highly debatable multirater labellingcited by 16
  11. 2018Capturing Ambiguity in Crowdsourcing Frame Disambiguationcited by 8
  12. 2021Training Affective Computer Vision Models by Crowdsourcing Soft-Target Labelscited by 8
3 more
  1. 2018Tagging like Humans: Diverse and Distinct Image Annotationcited by 3
  2. 2019Crowdsourced PAC Learning under Classification Noisecited by 2
  3. 2019Unfairness towards subjective opinions in Machine Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 13; 2024: 38; 2025: 32; 2026: 38.

129 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 164
  2. 2022The 'Problem' of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluationcited by 133
  3. 2023NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Modelscited by 91
  4. 2022Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotationcited by 67
  5. 2023SemEval-2023 Task 11: Learning With Disagreements (LeWiDi)cited by 52
  6. 2022Evaluation Gaps in Machine Learning Practicecited by 48
  7. 2024VariErr NLI: Separating Annotation Error from Human Label Variationcited by 42
  8. 2024The Perspectivist Paradigm Shift: Assumptions and Challenges of Capturing Human Labelscited by 37
  9. 2025Pragmatics in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey on Datasets, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challengescited by 31
  10. 2024The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representationcited by 29
  11. 2023Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Taskscited by 28
  12. 2023Disentangling Perceptions of Offensiveness: Cultural and Moral Correlatescited by 26
38 more
  1. 2022Unifying Data Perspectivism and Personalization: An Application to Social Normscited by 22
  2. 2023Consistency is Key: Disentangling Label Variation in Natural Language Processing with Intra-Annotator Agreementcited by 22
  3. 2024Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questionscited by 21
  4. 2025AI Alignment at Your Discretioncited by 20
  5. 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipediacited by 18
  6. 2024Annotator-Centric Active Learning for Subjective NLP Taskscited by 18
  7. 2024"Seeing the Big through the Small": Can LLMs Approximate Human Judgment Distributions on NLI from a Few Explanations?cited by 16
  8. 2025The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AIcited by 16
  9. 2023Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?cited by 15
  10. 2024Crowd-Calibrator: Can Annotator Disagreement Inform Calibration in Subjective Tasks?cited by 13
  11. 2021Two Contrasting Data Annotation Paradigms for Subjective NLP Taskscited by 12
  12. 2023iLab at SemEval-2023 Task 11 Le-Wi-Di: Modelling Disagreement or Modelling Perspectives?cited by 10
  13. 2026Beyond Consensus: Perspectivist Modeling and Evaluation of Annotator Disagreement in NLPcited by 10
  14. 2024An Empirical Analysis of Diversity in Argument Summarizationcited by 9
  15. 2024D3CODE: Disentangling Disagreements in Data across Cultures on Offensiveness Detection and Evaluationcited by 9
  16. 2024"Cold, Calculated, and Condescending": How AI Identifies and Explains Ableism Compared to Disabled Peoplecited by 9
  17. 2023A Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Modern Digital Forensics and Incident Responsecited by 8
  18. 2024Discipline and Label: A WEIRD Genealogy and Social Theory of Data Annotationcited by 8
  19. 2024Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scalingcited by 8
  20. 2024Rater Cohesion and Quality from a Vicarious Perspectivecited by 8
  21. 2024Leveraging Annotator Disagreement for Text Classificationcited by 8
  22. 2024Morality is Non-Binary: Building a Pluralist Moral Sentence Embedding Space using Contrastive Learningcited by 7
  23. 2024Value Preferences Estimation and Disambiguation in Hybrid Participatory Systemscited by 7
  24. 2024Re-examining Sexism and Misogyny Classification with Annotator Attitudescited by 7
  25. 2024Venire: A Machine Learning-Guided Panel Review System for Community Content Moderationcited by 7
  26. 2023A Corpus for Sentence-level Subjectivity Detection on English News Articlescited by 6
  27. 2024LEMoN: Label Error Detection using Multimodal Neighborscited by 6
  28. 2025Fine-grained Fallacy Detection with Human Label Variationcited by 6
  29. 2023Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collectioncited by 5
  30. 2023Architectural Sweet Spots for Modeling Human Label Variation by the Example of Argument Quality: It's Best to Relate Perspectives!cited by 5
  31. 2025Towards a Perspectivist Turn in Argument Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  32. 2025NUTMEG: Separating Signal From Noise in Annotator Disagreementcited by 5
  33. 2022Norm Participation Grounds Languagecited by 4
  34. 2023PopBERT. Detecting populism and its host ideologies in the German Bundestagcited by 4
  35. 2024Cost-Efficient Subjective Task Annotation and Modeling through Few-Shot Annotator Adaptationcited by 4
  36. 2024Argument Quality Assessment in the Age of Instruction-Following Large Language Modelscited by 4
  37. 2024AustroTox: A Dataset for Target-Based Austrian German Offensive Language Detectioncited by 4
  38. 2024What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"cited by 4

50 most cited of 129 All 129 (JSON)