mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkits

arXiv 2205.06922 ↗First posted 13 May 2022cs.HC cs.AI cs.CYcited by 34

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent years have seen the development of many open-source ML fairness toolkits aimed at helping ML practitioners assess and address unfairness in their systems. However, there has been little research investigating how ML practitioners actually use these toolkits in practice. In this paper, we conducted the first in-depth empirical exploration of how industry practitioners (try to) work with existing fairness toolkits. In particular, we conducted think-aloud interviews to understand how participants learn about and use fairness toolkits, and explored the generality of our findings through an anonymous online survey. We identified several opportunities for fairness toolkits to better address practitioner needs and scaffold them in using toolkits effectively and responsibly. Based on these findings, we highlight implications for the design of future open-source fairness toolkits that can support practitioners in better contextualizing, communicating, and collaborating around ML fairness efforts.

Key facts. Cited by 34 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 122 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2022.

Builds on

40 of 122 references.

References · 40

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  5. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  6. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  7. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  8. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 260
  9. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  10. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  11. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
  12. 2021Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyondcited by 104
28 more
  1. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  2. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  3. 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
  4. 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
  5. 2020A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scorescited by 74
  6. 2020How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Toolscited by 64
  7. 2021Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Supportcited by 63
  8. 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
  9. 2019Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 57
  10. 2020"What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand": Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairnesscited by 56
  11. 2021Everyday algorithm auditing: Understanding the power of everyday users in surfacing harmful algorithmic behaviorscited by 50
  12. 2020Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differencescited by 41
  13. 2020Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for shifting Organizational Practicescited by 39
  14. 2018Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Predictioncited by 35
  15. 2021Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systemscited by 31
  16. 2021Discovering and Validating AI Errors With Crowdsourced Failure Reportscited by 28
  17. 2020Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer Visioncited by 25
  18. 2017Themis-ml: A Fairness-aware Machine Learning Interface for End-to-end Discrimination Discovery and Mitigationcited by 24
  19. 2019This Thing Called Fairness: Disciplinary Confusion Realizing a Value in Technologycited by 24
  20. 2020Trust in Data Science: Collaboration, Translation, and Accountability in Corporate Data Science Projectscited by 24
  21. 2020Value Cards: An Educational Toolkit for Teaching Social Impacts of Machine Learning through Deliberationcited by 24
  22. 2021Uncertainty Quantification 360: A Holistic Toolkit for Quantifying and Communicating the Uncertainty of AIcited by 22
  23. 2021How Much Automation Does a Data Scientist Want?cited by 20
  24. 2021Designing for human-AI complementarity in K-12 educationcited by 19
  25. 2019Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomescited by 15
  26. 2020Data Vision: Learning to See Through Algorithmic Abstractioncited by 11
  27. 2021Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?cited by 11
  28. 2020Fairkit, Fairkit, on the Wall, Who's the Fairest of Them All? Supporting Data Scientists in Training Fair Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 9; 2024: 10; 2025: 8; 2026: 4.

34 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Design Principles for Generative AI Applicationscited by 57
  2. 2022Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry Practicecited by 32
  3. 2024LLM-Driven Robots Risk Enacting Discrimination, Violence, and Unlawful Actionscited by 22
  4. 2024Real Risks of Fake Data: Synthetic Data, Diversity-Washing and Consent Circumventioncited by 21
  5. 2022Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AIcited by 20
  6. 2023Designerly Understanding: Information Needs for Model Transparency to Support Design Ideation for AI-Powered User Experiencecited by 18
  7. 2023Can Fairness be Automated? Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoMLcited by 16
  8. 2023Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"cited by 15
  9. 2023Investigating Practices and Opportunities for Cross-functional Collaboration around AI Fairness in Industry Practicecited by 15
  10. 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 9
  11. 2025PersonaTeaming: Exploring How Introducing Personas Can Improve Automated AI Red-Teamingcited by 9
  12. 2023Fairness Evaluation in Text Classification: Machine Learning Practitioner Perspectives of Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 7
22 more
  1. 2024From Paper to Card: Transforming Design Implications with Generative AIcited by 6
  2. 2023Navigating Fairness Measures and Trade-Offscited by 5
  3. 2024A Catalog of Fairness-Aware Practices in Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 4
  4. 2025MIRAGE: Multi-model Interface for Reviewing and Auditing Generative Text-to-Image AIcited by 4
  5. 2023SuperNOVA: Design Strategies and Opportunities for Interactive Visualization in Computational Notebookscited by 3
  6. 2025Understanding and Meeting Practitioner Needs When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systemscited by 3
  7. 2025Addressing Pitfalls in Auditing Practices of Automatic Speech Recognition Technologies: A Case Study of People with Aphasiacited by 3
  8. 2024A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasetscited by 2
  9. 2024Articulation Work and Tinkering for Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 2
  10. 2025Talking About the Assumption in the Roomcited by 2
  11. 2023Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains: synthesis and emerging research questionscited by 1
  12. 2024Navigating Fairness: Practitioners' Understanding, Challenges, and Strategies in AI/ML Developmentcited by 1
  13. 2024From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits?cited by 1
  14. 2025AI LEGO: Scaffolding Cross-Functional Collaboration in Industrial Responsible AI Practices during Early Design Stagescited by 1
  15. 2025Measurement as Bricolage: Examining How Data Scientists Construct Target Variables for Predictive Modeling Taskscited by 1
  16. 2026From Reflection to Repair: A Scoping Review of Dataset Documentation Toolscited by 1
  17. 2023Assessing Perceived Fairness from Machine Learning Developer's Perspectivecited by 0
  18. 2024Data Preparation for Fairness-Performance Trade-Offs: A Practitioner-Friendly Alternative?cited by 0
  19. 2025Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 0
  20. 2026RCTs for Frontier AI Governance: Methodological Challenges and Solutions for Human Uplift Studiescited by 0
  21. 2026Compliant But Unsatisfactory: The Gap Between Auditing Standards and Practices for Probabilistic Genotyping Softwarecited by 0
  22. 2026What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Researchcited by 0