mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ground Truth Or Dare: Factors Affecting The Creation Of Medical Datasets For Training AI

arXiv 2309.12327 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2023cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the core goals of responsible AI development is ensuring high-quality training datasets. Many researchers have pointed to the importance of the annotation step in the creation of high-quality data, but less attention has been paid to the work that enables data annotation. We define this work as the design of ground truth schema and explore the challenges involved in the creation of datasets in the medical domain even before any annotations are made. Based on extensive work in three health-tech organisations, we describe five external and internal factors that condition medical dataset creation processes. Three external factors include regulatory constraints, the context of creation and use, and commercial and operational pressures. These factors condition medical data collection and shape the ground truth schema design. Two internal factors include epistemic differences and limits of labelling. These directly shape the design of the ground truth schema. Discussions of what constitutes high-quality data need to pay attention to the factors that shape and constrain what is possible to be created, to ensure responsible AI design.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2023.

Builds on

21 of 71 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  2. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  3. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  5. 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 597
  6. 2019PadChest: A large chest x-ray image dataset with multi-label annotated reportscited by 309
  7. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
  8. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  9. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  10. 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
  11. 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
  12. 2020How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Toolscited by 64
9 more
  1. 2021Whose Ground Truth? Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Dataset Annotationcited by 52
  2. 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
  3. 2021A Step Toward More Inclusive People Annotations for Fairnesscited by 46
  4. 2019Exploring large scale public medical image datasetscited by 37
  5. 2020Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer Visioncited by 25
  6. 2021"Garbage In, Garbage Out" Revisited: What Do Machine Learning Application Papers Report About Human-Labeled Training Data?cited by 24
  7. 2022The Data-Production Dispositifcited by 16
  8. 2021Computer Vision and Conflicting Values: Describing People with Automated Alt Textcited by 14
  9. 2021Effect of Radiology Report Labeler Quality on Deep Learning Models for Chest X-Ray Interpretationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

11 papers.