Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI auditing is a rapidly growing field of research and practice. This review article, which doubles as an editorial to Digital Societys topical collection on Auditing of AI, provides an overview of previous work in the field. Three key points emerge from the review. First, contemporary attempts to audit AI systems have much to learn from how audits have historically been structured and conducted in areas like financial accounting, safety engineering and the social sciences. Second, both policymakers and technology providers have an interest in promoting auditing as an AI governance mechanism. Academic researchers can thus fill an important role by studying the feasibility and effectiveness of different AI auditing procedures. Third, AI auditing is an inherently multidisciplinary undertaking, to which substantial contributions have been made by computer scientists and engineers as well as social scientists, philosophers, legal scholars and industry practitioners. Reflecting this diversity of perspectives, different approaches to AI auditing have different affordances and constraints. Specifically, a distinction can be made between technology-oriented audits, which focus on the properties and capabilities of AI systems, and process oriented audits, which focus on technology providers governance structures and quality management systems. The next step in the evolution of auditing as an AI governance mechanism, this article concludes, should be the interlinking of these available (and complementary) approaches into structured and holistic procedures to audit not only how AI systems are designed and used but also how they impact users, societies and the natural environment in applied settings over time.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 208 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2024.
Builds on
62 of 208 references.
References · 62
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 167
38 more
- 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearningcited by 164
- 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 163
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
- 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 135
- 2021Truthful AI: Developing and governing AI that does not liecited by 109
- 2019Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelinescited by 107
- 2021Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscapecited by 107
- 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
- 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
- 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
- 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
- 2022Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization?cited by 89
- 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
- 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 82
- 2016Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligencecited by 74
- 2023Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystemcited by 49
- 2021Everyday algorithm auditing: Understanding the power of everyday users in surfacing harmful algorithmic behaviorscited by 47
- 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
- 2021Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systemscited by 30
- 2019Auditing and Achieving Intersectional Fairness in Classification Problemscited by 25
- 2020FairLens: Auditing Black-box Clinical Decision Support Systemscited by 23
- 2021Ethics-Based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AIcited by 23
- 2021Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studiescited by 22
- 2021Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Auditscited by 20
- 2021Ethics as a service: a pragmatic operationalisation of AI Ethicscited by 19
- 2021Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulationcited by 19
- 2019Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomescited by 15
- 2018Enslaving the Algorithm: From a "Right to an Explanation" to a "Right to Better Decisions"?cited by 14
- 2019A Mulching Proposalcited by 14
- 2021Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitationscited by 14
- 2022A Sandbox Tool to Bias(Stress)-Test Fairness Algorithmscited by 12
- 2013Practical Verification of Decision-Making in Agent-Based Autonomous Systemscited by 11
- 2019FAT Forensics: A Python Toolbox for Algorithmic Fairness, Accountability and Transparencycited by 11
- 2021Systematic Literature Review of Validation Methods for AI Systemscited by 10
- 2022An External Stability Audit Framework to Test the Validity of Personality Prediction in AI Hiringcited by 10
- 2018Open the Black Box Data-Driven Explanation of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 9
- 2020Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on Facebookcited by 9
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
9 papers.
- 2025Attestable Audits: Verifiable AI Safety Benchmarks Using Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 8
- 2025Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Actioncited by 3
- 2025Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models in the Bengali Legal Context: A Comparative Evaluation Using LLM-as-Judge and Legal Expertscited by 2
- 2026PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluationcited by 1
- 2025Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagementcited by 0
- 2026Who Built This Model? Tracing LLM Lineage via Spectral Fingerprints in Weight Spacecited by 0
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Levelcited by 0
- 2026MARLA: A Conceptual Scaffold for Regulatory Learning under the EU AI Actcited by 0
- 2026The AI Assessment Sandbox Configurator: A Framework to Support Technical Assessment in AI Regulatory Sandboxescited by 0
- 2026The AI Assessment Sandbox Configurator: A Framework to Support Technical Assessment in AI Regulatory Sandboxes1 Oct 2026
- 2026MARLA: A Conceptual Scaffold for Regulatory Learning under the EU AI Act4 Sep 2026
- 2026Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Level7 Aug 2026
- 2026Who Built This Model? Tracing LLM Lineage via Spectral Fingerprints in Weight Space7 Aug 2026
- 2026PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluation16 Jan 2026
- 2025Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models in the Bengali Legal Context: A Comparative Evaluation Using LLM-as-Judge and Legal Experts7 Nov 2025
- 2025Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagement1 Sep 2025
- 2025Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action28 Aug 2025
- 2025Attestable Audits: Verifiable AI Safety Benchmarks Using Trusted Execution Environments30 Jun 2025