mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NH-CROP: Robust Pricing for Governed Language Data Assets under Cost Uncertainty

arXiv 2605.01745 ↗First posted 3 May 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language data are increasingly acquired and governed as assets, yet platforms often price candidate resources before knowing their true privacy or access costs. We study online pricing for governed language data assets under cost uncertainty. At each round, a platform observes an NLP task, a candidate asset, and a coarse cost estimate, may pay for a refined cost signal, posts a price, and receives safe net revenue. We introduce textscNH-CROP, a clipped robust pricing framework with a no-harm information-acquisition gate. The method compares direct pricing, risk-aware pricing, and verify-then-price, and acquires information only when its estimated decision value exceeds the best no-verification alternative. Across synthetic, real-proxy, and downstream-utility-grounded benchmarks, clipped textscNH-CROP variants improve or remain competitive with price-only and risk-aware baselines. Causal ablations show that paid verification is not the main source of gains in real-proxy and utility-grounded settings: the strongest learned policies often choose not to verify. Oracle and high-decision-value diagnostics show that refined cost information can still have substantial local value. Overall, governed language-data platforms should calibrate pricing under uncertain access costs first and verify only when information is cheap and decision-actionable.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

Builds on

31 of 52 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  3. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  6. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
  7. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  8. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
  9. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  10. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
  11. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  12. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
19 more
  1. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  2. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  3. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  4. 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
  5. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
  6. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  7. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
  8. 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 309
  9. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 259
  10. 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 186
  11. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
  12. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  13. 2019Linear Stochastic Bandits Under Safety Constraintscited by 90
  14. 2016Conservative Contextual Linear Banditscited by 56
  15. 2016Dynamic Pricing in High-dimensionscited by 55
  16. 2020Active Feature Acquisition with Generative Surrogate Modelscited by 53
  17. 2017Context Attentive Bandits: Contextual Bandit with Restricted Contextcited by 14
  18. 2024Improved Algorithms for Contextual Dynamic Pricingcited by 11
  19. 2024Learning to Price Homogeneous Datacited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.