Completeness of Datasets Documentation on ML/AI repositories: an Empirical Investigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
ML/AI is the field of computer science and computer engineering that arguably received the most attention and funding over the last decade. Data is the key element of ML/AI, so it is becoming increasingly important to ensure that users are fully aware of the quality of the datasets that they use, and of the process generating them, so that possible negative impacts on downstream effects can be tracked, analysed, and, where possible, mitigated. One of the tools that can be useful in this perspective is dataset documentation. The aim of this work is to investigate the state of dataset documentation practices, measuring the completeness of the documentation of several popular datasets in ML/AI repositories. We created a dataset documentation schema -- the Documentation Test Sheet (DTS) -- that identifies the information that should always be attached to a dataset (to ensure proper dataset choice and informed use), according to relevant studies in the literature. We verified 100 popular datasets from four different repositories with the DTS to investigate which information was present. Overall, we observed a lack of relevant documentation, especially about the context of data collection and data processing, highlighting a paucity of transparency.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.
Builds on
17 of 27 references.
References · 17
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2022Can Machines Help Us Answering Question 16 in Datasheets, and In Turn Reflecting on Inappropriate Content?cited by 155
- 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
- 2019Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learningcited by 116
- 2021Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Researchcited by 102
- 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
- 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
- 2019Garbage In, Garbage Out? Do Machine Learning Application Papers in Social Computing Report Where Human-Labeled Training Data Comes From?cited by 64
- 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
- 2021Fairness in Ranking: A Surveycited by 33
5 more
- 2021A Framework for Deprecating Datasets: Standardizing Documentation, Identification, and Communicationcited by 18
- 2020Data Readiness Reportcited by 17
- 2023Augmented Datasheets for Speech Datasets and Ethical Decision-Makingcited by 16
- 2020A Methodology for Creating AI FactSheetscited by 15
- 2018A Nutritional Label for Rankingscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyondcited by 2
- 2026From Reflection to Repair: A Scoping Review of Dataset Documentation Toolscited by 1
- 2026AdaQE-CG: Adaptive Query Expansion for Web-Scale Generative AI Model and Data Card Generationcited by 0
- 2026AdaQE-CG: Adaptive Query Expansion for Web-Scale Generative AI Model and Data Card Generation16 Mar 2026
- 2026From Reflection to Repair: A Scoping Review of Dataset Documentation Tools17 Feb 2026
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyond9 Jul 2025