Eval Factsheets: A Structured Framework for Documenting AI Evaluations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid proliferation of benchmarks has created significant challenges in reproducibility, transparency, and informed decision-making. However, unlike datasets and models -- which benefit from structured documentation frameworks like Datasheets and Model Cards -- evaluation methodologies lack systematic documentation standards. We introduce Eval Factsheets, a structured, descriptive framework for documenting AI system evaluations through a comprehensive taxonomy and questionnaire-based approach. Our framework organizes evaluation characteristics across five fundamental dimensions: Context (Who made the evaluation and when?), Scope (What does it evaluate?), Structure (With what the evaluation is built?), Method (How does it work?) and Alignment (In what ways is it reliable/valid/robust?). We implement this taxonomy as a practical questionnaire spanning five sections with mandatory and recommended documentation elements. Through case studies on multiple benchmarks, we demonstrate that Eval Factsheets effectively captures diverse evaluation paradigms -- from traditional benchmarks to LLM-as-judge methodologies -- while maintaining consistency and comparability. We hope Eval Factsheets are incorporated into both existing and newly released evaluation frameworks and lead to more transparency and reproducibility.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.
Builds on
16 of 23 references.
References · 16
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 339
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
- 2019Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Resultscited by 164
4 more
- 2025Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 102
- 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
- 2024VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Modelscited by 53
- 2022System Cards for AI-Based Decision-Making for Public Policycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Resultscited by 2
- 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agentscited by 1
- 2026Automated Transcript Analysis for Detecting Flaws in Agentic Benchmarkscited by 1
- 2026What Does an LLM-Agent Leaderboard Rank Actually Compare?cited by 1
- 2026Croissant Tasks: A Metadata Format for Reproducible Machine Learning Evaluationscited by 0
- 2026The Benchmark Trap: Structures of Power and Injustice in AI Evaluationscited by 0
- 2026Frozen Scenes, Shifting Winners: Configuration Fragility in Text-to-3D Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Ontology-Based Contextual AI Evaluations (OB-CAIE) Methodologycited by 0
- 2026Ontology-Based Contextual AI Evaluations (OB-CAIE) Methodology30 Sep 2026
- 2026Frozen Scenes, Shifting Winners: Configuration Fragility in Text-to-3D Evaluation30 Sep 2026
- 2026What Does an LLM-Agent Leaderboard Rank Actually Compare?7 Sep 2026
- 2026The Benchmark Trap: Structures of Power and Injustice in AI Evaluations15 Aug 2026
- 2026Automated Transcript Analysis for Detecting Flaws in Agentic Benchmarks29 Jul 2026
- 2026Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results12 Jun 2026
- 2026Croissant Tasks: A Metadata Format for Reproducible Machine Learning Evaluations28 May 2026
- 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents11 Apr 2026