Position: Fairness Failure in Generative Models is an Evaluation Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite groundbreaking advancements in generative models during the last decade, concerns about their lack of fairness, reinforcing societal inequalities and harming marginalized groups, remain under-addressed and difficult to act upon. This position paper argues that fairness failures in generative models, albeit driven by multiple factors, are ultimately stemming from an evaluation problem: fairness findings are rarely comparable across papers or actionable for deployment decisions. This paper diagnoses recurring empirical and conceptual failure modes in current practice and motivates a shift from ad-hoc bias checks to standardized, generative-specific evaluation. We propose Fairness Cards as a minimal reporting artifact that makes evaluation choices explicit (prompt families, counterfactual protocols, metrics, and refusal handling) enabling reproducibility, comparability, and accountability. We conclude with additional recommendations towards a paradigm shift in evaluation standards. Our project page can be found at https://mariiavladimirova.github.io/fairness-cards .
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
58 of 104 references.
References · 58
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
38 more
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
- 2024Movie Gen: A Cast of Media Foundation Modelscited by 644
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 492
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
- 2020Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Modelscited by 434
- 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 412
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 322
- 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 264
- 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 226
- 2022The Role of ImageNet Classes in Fr'echet Inception Distancecited by 213
- 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 205
- 2023The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Modelscited by 173
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
- 2022"I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Datasetcited by 162
- 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
- 2023Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Promptingcited by 81
- 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
- 2023VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolutioncited by 52
- 2024Balancing Act: Distribution-Guided Debiasing in Diffusion Modelscited by 52
- 2024FairMedFM: Fairness Benchmarking for Medical Imaging Foundation Modelscited by 47
- 2023Don't Play Favorites: Minority Guidance for Diffusion Modelscited by 37
- 2023Can You Rely on Your Model Evaluation? Improving Model Evaluation with Synthetic Test Datacited by 32
- 2021Measuring Fairness in Generative Modelscited by 31
- 2022Studying Bias in GANs through the Lens of Racecited by 31
- 2024'Simulacrum of Stories': Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research Participantscited by 28
- 2022Fair Generative Models via Transfer Learningcited by 27
- 2024The Dark Side of Dataset Scaling: Evaluating Racial Classification in Multimodal Modelscited by 23
- 2023Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairnesscited by 22
- 2024The Impossibility of Fair LLMscited by 22
- 2025Does Reasoning Introduce Bias? A Study of Social Bias Evaluation and Mitigation in LLM Reasoningcited by 21
- 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
- 2021Measuring Hidden Bias within Face Recognition via Racial Phenotypescited by 16
- 2023Improving Fairness and Robustness in End-to-End Speech Recognition through unsupervised clusteringcited by 11
- 2024MIST: Mitigating Intersectional Bias with Disentangled Cross-Attention Editing in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 10
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.