mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latent Class-Conditional Noise Model

arXiv 2302.09595 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning with noisy labels has become imperative in the Big Data era, which saves expensive human labors on accurate annotations. Previous noise-transition-based methods have achieved theoretically-grounded performance under the Class-Conditional Noise model (CCN). However, these approaches builds upon an ideal but impractical anchor set available to pre-estimate the noise transition. Even though subsequent works adapt the estimation as a neural layer, the ill-posed stochastic learning of its parameters in back-propagation easily falls into undesired local minimums. We solve this problem by introducing a Latent Class-Conditional Noise model (LCCN) to parameterize the noise transition under a Bayesian framework. By projecting the noise transition into the Dirichlet space, the learning is constrained on a simplex characterized by the complete dataset, instead of some ad-hoc parametric space wrapped by the neural layer. We then deduce a dynamic label regression method for LCCN, whose Gibbs sampler allows us efficiently infer the latent true labels to train the classifier and to model the noise. Our approach safeguards the stable update of the noise transition, which avoids previous arbitrarily tuning from a mini-batch of samples. We further generalize LCCN to different counterparts compatible with open-set noisy labels, semi-supervised learning as well as cross-model training. A range of experiments demonstrate the advantages of LCCN and its variants over the current state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2023.

Builds on

48 of 78 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  6. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  7. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  10. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  11. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  12. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
36 more
  1. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  2. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  3. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  4. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  5. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  6. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  7. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
  8. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  9. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  10. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  11. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  12. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  13. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  14. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  15. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  16. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  17. 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
  18. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
  19. 2014Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networkscited by 116
  20. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  21. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  22. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  23. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  24. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  25. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  26. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  27. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
  28. 2018Collaborative Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 69
  29. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  30. 2015Seeing through the Human Reporting Bias: Visual Classifiers from Noisy Human-Centric Labelscited by 64
  31. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  32. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  33. 2016Does Distributionally Robust Supervised Learning Give Robust Classifiers?cited by 38
  34. 2021Learning with Group Noisecited by 5
  35. 2021Collaborative Label Correction via Entropy Thresholdingcited by 2
  36. 2021Cooperative Learning for Noisy Supervisioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

9 papers.