mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Random Smoothing Regularization in Kernel Gradient Descent Learning

arXiv 2305.03531 ↗First posted 5 May 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Random smoothing data augmentation is a unique form of regularization that can prevent overfitting by introducing noise to the input data, encouraging the model to learn more generalized features. Despite its success in various applications, there has been a lack of systematic study on the regularization ability of random smoothing. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by presenting a framework for random smoothing regularization that can adaptively and effectively learn a wide range of ground truth functions belonging to the classical Sobolev spaces. Specifically, we investigate two underlying function spaces: the Sobolev space of low intrinsic dimension, which includes the Sobolev space in D-dimensional Euclidean space or low-dimensional sub-manifolds as special cases, and the mixed smooth Sobolev space with a tensor structure. By using random smoothing regularization as novel convolution-based smoothing kernels, we can attain optimal convergence rates in these cases using a kernel gradient descent algorithm, either with early stopping or weight decay. It is noteworthy that our estimator can adapt to the structural assumptions of the underlying data and avoid the curse of dimensionality. This is achieved through various choices of injected noise distributions such as Gaussian, Laplace, or general polynomial noises, allowing for broad adaptation to the aforementioned structural assumptions of the underlying data. The convergence rate depends only on the effective dimension, which may be significantly smaller than the actual data dimension. We conduct numerical experiments on simulated data to validate our theoretical results.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2023.

Builds on

45 of 115 references.

References · 45

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  6. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  8. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  9. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  10. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  11. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  12. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
33 more
  1. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  2. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  3. 2018Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent on Structured Datacited by 260
  4. 2015Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Structured Gaussian Processes (KISS-GP)cited by 175
  5. 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 158
  6. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  7. 2020Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 103
  8. 2019Harnessing the Power of Infinitely Wide Deep Nets on Small-data Taskscited by 87
  9. 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
  10. 2019Enhanced Convolutional Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
  11. 2020On the Similarity between the Laplace and Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
  12. 2020On Certifying Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 74
  13. 2020Deep Neural Tangent Kernel and Laplace Kernel Have the Same RKHScited by 74
  14. 2018Statistical Optimality of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Hard Learning Problems through Multiple Passescited by 69
  15. 2016Optimal Rates For Regularization Of Statistical Inverse Learning Problemscited by 68
  16. 2019Generalization Error Bounds of Gradient Descent for Learning Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 60
  17. 2020Why Do Deep Residual Networks Generalize Better than Deep Feedforward Networks? -- A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspectivecited by 60
  18. 2016Distributed learning with regularized least squarescited by 42
  19. 2017Characteristic and Universal Tensor Product Kernelscited by 41
  20. 2020Regularization Matters: A Nonparametric Perspective on Overparametrized Neural Networkcited by 38
  21. 2020Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify ℓ_∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Imagescited by 35
  22. 2017Early stopping for kernel boosting algorithms: A general analysis with localized complexitiescited by 27
  23. 2020How Robust are Randomized Smoothing based Defenses to Data Poisoning?cited by 15
  24. 2021Understanding Square Loss in Training Overparametrized Neural Network Classifierscited by 14
  25. 2015A theoretical framework for calibration in computer models: parametrization, estimation and convergence propertiescited by 12
  26. 2020Certified Robustness of Graph Classification against Topology Attack with Randomized Smoothingcited by 12
  27. 2022Kernel Packet: An Exact and Scalable Algorithm for Gaussian Process Regression with Mat'ern Correlationscited by 10
  28. 2015Iterative Regularization for Learning with Convex Loss Functionscited by 9
  29. 2015A simpler condition for consistency of a kernel independence testcited by 8
  30. 2016Convergence rates of Kernel Conjugate Gradient for random design regressioncited by 8
  31. 2020Sample and Computationally Efficient Stochastic Kriging in High Dimensionscited by 6
  32. 2021A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspective of Infinite Tree Ensemblescited by 4
  33. 2015Gaussian Process Regression with Location Errorscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.