Enhancing Sample Utilization in Noise-Robust Deep Metric Learning With Subgroup-Based Positive-Pair Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The existence of noisy labels in real-world data negatively impacts the performance of deep learning models. Although much research effort has been devoted to improving the robustness towards noisy labels in classification tasks, the problem of noisy labels in deep metric learning (DML) remains under-explored. Existing noisy label learning methods designed for DML mainly discard suspicious noisy samples, resulting in a waste of the training data. To address this issue, we propose a noise-robust DML framework with SubGroup-based Positive-pair Selection (SGPS), which constructs reliable positive pairs for noisy samples to enhance the sample utilization. Specifically, SGPS first effectively identifies clean and noisy samples by a probability-based clean sample selectionstrategy. To further utilize the remaining noisy samples, we discover their potential similar samples based on the subgroup information given by a subgroup generation module and then aggregate them into informative positive prototypes for each noisy sample via a positive prototype generation module. Afterward, a new contrastive loss is tailored for the noisy samples with their selected positive pairs. SGPS can be easily integrated into the training process of existing pair-wise DML tasks, like image retrieval and face recognition. Extensive experiments on multiple synthetic and real-world large-scale label noise datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. Without any bells and whistles, our SGPS framework outperforms the state-of-the-art noisy label DML methods. Code is available at urlhttps://github.com/smuelpeng/SGPS-NoiseFreeDML.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2025.
Builds on
47 of 80 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 621
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
35 more
- 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 402
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
- 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
- 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
- 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2019SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet Samplingcited by 163
- 2019Cross-Batch Memory for Embedding Learningcited by 130
- 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
- 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2022Hyperbolic Vision Transformers: Combining Improvements in Metric Learningcited by 109
- 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
- 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
- 2020ProxyNCA++: Revisiting and Revitalizing Proxy Neighborhood Component Analysiscited by 107
- 2020Online Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 99
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
- 2017Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithmscited by 60
- 2023Unicom: Universal and Compact Representation Learning for Image Retrievalcited by 36
- 2021Noise-resistant Deep Metric Learning with Ranking-based Instance Selectioncited by 23
- 2019Noise-Tolerant Paradigm for Training Face Recognition CNNscited by 20
- 2023Label-Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models for Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 20
- 2021Robust and Decomposable Average Precision for Image Retrievalcited by 19
- 2019Large-scale Landmark Retrieval/Recognition under a Noisy and Diverse Datasetcited by 17
- 2021Dynamic Class Queue for Large Scale Face Recognition In the Wildcited by 14
- 2018Deep Metric Learning by Online Soft Mining and Class-Aware Attentioncited by 12
- 2022Attributable Visual Similarity Learningcited by 12
- 2022Learning to Purification for Unsupervised Person Re-identificationcited by 11
- 2020One for More: Selecting Generalizable Samples for Generalizable ReID Modelcited by 9
- 2021Adaptive Hierarchical Similarity Metric Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 8
- 2022Exploring the Algorithm-Dependent Generalization of AUPRC Optimization with List Stabilitycited by 8
- 2022Supervised Metric Learning to Rank for Retrieval via Contextual Similarity Optimizationcited by 5
- 2022Deep Image Retrieval is not Robust to Label Noisecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.