mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurations

arXiv 2305.12715 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning with reduced labeling standards, such as noisy label, partial label, and multiple label candidates, which we generically refer to as textitimprecise labels, is a commonplace challenge in machine learning tasks. Previous methods tend to propose specific designs for every emerging imprecise label configuration, which is usually unsustainable when multiple configurations of imprecision coexist. In this paper, we introduce imprecise label learning (ILL), a framework for the unification of learning with various imprecise label configurations. ILL leverages expectation-maximization (EM) for modeling the imprecise label information, treating the precise labels as latent variables.Instead of approximating the correct labels for training, it considers the entire distribution of all possible labeling entailed by the imprecise information. We demonstrate that ILL can seamlessly adapt to partial label learning, semi-supervised learning, noisy label learning, and, more importantly, a mixture of these settings. Notably, ILL surpasses the existing specified techniques for handling imprecise labels, marking the first unified framework with robust and effective performance across various challenging settings. We hope our work will inspire further research on this topic, unleashing the full potential of ILL in wider scenarios where precise labels are expensive and complicated to obtain.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 82 of its 150 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

82 of 150 references.

References · 82

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  7. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  9. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  10. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  11. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  12. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
38 more
  1. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  2. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  3. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  4. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  5. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  6. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  7. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  8. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  10. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  11. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  12. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
  13. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  14. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  15. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  16. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
  17. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
  18. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  19. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  20. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  21. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  22. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 374
  23. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  24. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  25. 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 289
  26. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  27. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  28. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  29. 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
  30. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  31. 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
  32. 2020CoMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Contrastive Graph Regularizationcited by 167
  33. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  34. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  35. 2021Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 148
  36. 2020Learning Diverse and Discriminative Representations via the Principle of Maximal Coding Rate Reductioncited by 142
  37. 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
  38. 2022SimMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Similarity Matchingcited by 118

50 most cited of 82 All 82 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

9 papers.