mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalization

arXiv 2208.11351 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 33

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sample selection is an effective strategy to mitigate the effect of label noise in robust learning. Typical strategies commonly apply the small-loss criterion to identify clean samples. However, those samples lying around the decision boundary with large losses usually entangle with noisy examples, which would be discarded with this criterion, leading to the heavy degeneration of the generalization performance. In this paper, we propose a novel selection strategy, Self-Filtering (SFT), that utilizes the fluctuation of noisy examples in historical predictions to filter them, which can avoid the selection bias of the small-loss criterion for the boundary examples. Specifically, we introduce a memory bank module that stores the historical predictions of each example and dynamically updates to support the selection for the subsequent learning iteration. Besides, to reduce the accumulated error of the sample selection bias of SFT, we devise a regularization term to penalize the confident output distribution. By increasing the weight of the misclassified categories with this term, the loss function is robust to label noise in mild conditions. We conduct extensive experiments on three benchmarks with variant noise types and achieve the new state-of-the-art. Ablation studies and further analysis verify the virtue of SFT for sample selection in robust learning.

Key facts. Cited by 33 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2022.

Builds on

31 of 45 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  3. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  5. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  6. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  7. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  8. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  9. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  10. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  11. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  12. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
19 more
  1. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  2. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  3. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  4. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  5. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  6. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  7. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  8. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  9. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 161
  10. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  11. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  12. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  13. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 113
  14. 2019Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergencescited by 61
  15. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  16. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  17. 2020Learning to Purify Noisy Labels via Meta Soft Label Correctorcited by 39
  18. 2019L_DMI: An Information-theoretic Noise-robust Loss Functioncited by 26
  19. 2021Learning to Rectify for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 11; 2024: 11; 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

33 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023FedNoRo: Towards Noise-Robust Federated Learning by Addressing Class Imbalance and Label Noise Heterogeneitycited by 33
  2. 2025Early Stopping Against Label Noise Without Validation Datacited by 21
  3. 2023Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examplescited by 17
  4. 2024CLIPCleaner: Cleaning Noisy Labels with CLIPcited by 16
  5. 2023Fine-Grained Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 15
  6. 2024Cascade-Aware Training of Language Modelscited by 15
  7. 2023CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
  8. 2023ERASE: Error-Resilient Representation Learning on Graphs for Label Noise Tolerancecited by 11
  9. 2023Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurationscited by 9
  10. 2024Diversified and Personalized Multi-rater Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
  11. 2024Learning Discriminative Dynamics with Label Corruption for Noisy Label Detectioncited by 9
  12. 2025Handling Label Noise via Instance-Level Difficulty Modeling and Dynamic Optimizationcited by 6
21 more
  1. 2025FNBench: Benchmarking Robust Federated Learning against Noisy Labelscited by 6
  2. 2023MetaViewer: Towards A Unified Multi-View Representationcited by 5
  3. 2024Learning with Noisy Labels: Interconnection of Two Expectation-Maximizationscited by 4
  4. 2025Enhancing Sample Selection Against Label Noise by Cutting Mislabeled Easy Examplescited by 4
  5. 2025ChronoSelect: Robust Learning with Noisy Labels via Dynamics Temporal Memorycited by 4
  6. 2024You can't handle the (dirty) truth: Data-centric insights improve pseudo-labelingcited by 3
  7. 2024D2SP: Dynamic Dual-Stage Purification Framework for Dual Noise Mitigation in Vision-based Affective Recognitioncited by 3
  8. 2023LNL+K: Enhancing Learning with Noisy Labels Through Noise Source Knowledge Integrationcited by 2
  9. 2023Learning with Noisy Labels Using Collaborative Sample Selection and Contrastive Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 2
  10. 2025Noise-Aware Generalization: Robustness to In-Domain Noise and Out-of-Domain Generalizationcited by 2
  11. 2025Robust Learning of Diffusion Models with Extremely Noisy Conditionscited by 2
  12. 2024Understanding and Mitigating the Bias in Sample Selection for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 1
  13. 2024Poor-Supervised Evaluation for SuperLLM via Mutual Consistencycited by 1
  14. 2025Multi-View Oriented GPLVM: Expressiveness and Efficiencycited by 1
  15. 2023A Unified Framework for Connecting Noise Modeling to Boost Noise Detectioncited by 0
  16. 2023Hypothesis Testing for Class-Conditional Noise Using Local Maximum Likelihoodcited by 0
  17. 2024Jump-teaching: Combating Sample Selection Bias via Temporal Disagreementcited by 0
  18. 2024Distribution-Consistency-Guided Multi-modal Hashingcited by 0
  19. 2025MCA: 2D-3D Retrieval with Noisy Labels via Multi-level Adaptive Correction and Alignmentcited by 0
  20. 2026DREAM: Dual-Standard Semantic Homogeneity with Dynamic Optimization for Graph Learning with Label Noisecited by 0
  21. 2026Variational Rectification Inference for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 0