mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unleashing the Potential of Regularization Strategies in Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2307.05025 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, research on learning with noisy labels has focused on devising novel algorithms that can achieve robustness to noisy training labels while generalizing to clean data. These algorithms often incorporate sophisticated techniques, such as noise modeling, label correction, and co-training. In this study, we demonstrate that a simple baseline using cross-entropy loss, combined with widely used regularization strategies like learning rate decay, model weights average, and data augmentations, can outperform state-of-the-art methods. Our findings suggest that employing a combination of regularization strategies can be more effective than intricate algorithms in tackling the challenges of learning with noisy labels. While some of these regularization strategies have been utilized in previous noisy label learning research, their full potential has not been thoroughly explored. Our results encourage a reevaluation of benchmarks for learning with noisy labels and prompt reconsideration of the role of specialized learning algorithms designed for training with noisy labels.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2023.

Builds on

43 of 62 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  7. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  8. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  9. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  10. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  11. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  12. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
31 more
  1. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  2. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  3. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  6. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  7. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  8. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  9. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  10. 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 370
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  13. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  14. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  15. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  16. 2019Towards Explaining the Regularization Effect of Initial Large Learning Rate in Training Neural Networkscited by 162
  17. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  18. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  19. 2018An Alternative View: When Does SGD Escape Local Minima?cited by 115
  20. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 113
  21. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  22. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  23. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  24. 2018Data augmentation instead of explicit regularizationcited by 63
  25. 2021Adaptive Early-Learning Correction for Segmentation from Noisy Annotationscited by 62
  26. 2021Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning under a Structural Causal Modelcited by 50
  27. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 39
  28. 2020Improving Generalization by Controlling Label-Noise Information in Neural Network Weightscited by 35
  29. 2022On Learning Contrastive Representations for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 21
  30. 2022PADDLES: Phase-Amplitude Spectrum Disentangled Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  31. 2019Robust Learning Under Label Noise With Iterative Noise-Filteringcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

5 papers.