Noisy Early Stopping for Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training neural network classifiers on datasets contaminated with noisy labels significantly increases the risk of overfitting. Thus, effectively implementing Early Stopping in noisy label environments is crucial. Under ideal circumstances, Early Stopping utilises a validation set uncorrupted by label noise to effectively monitor generalisation during training. However, obtaining a noise-free validation dataset can be costly and challenging to obtain. This study establishes that, in many typical learning environments, a noise-free validation set is not necessary for effective Early Stopping. Instead, near-optimal results can be achieved by monitoring accuracy on a noisy dataset - drawn from the same distribution as the noisy training set. Referred to as `Noisy Early Stopping' (NES), this method simplifies and reduces the cost of implementing Early Stopping. We provide theoretical insights into the conditions under which this method is effective and empirically demonstrate its robust performance across standard benchmarks using common loss functions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2024.
Builds on
42 of 63 references.
References · 42
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
30 more
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 158
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
- 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
- 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
- 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
- 2017On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classificationcited by 68
- 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
- 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
- 2014Making Risk Minimization Tolerant to Label Noisecited by 54
- 2014Training Convolutional Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 47
- 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
- 2017Early Stopping without a Validation Setcited by 39
- 2020Improving Generalization by Controlling Label-Noise Information in Neural Network Weightscited by 35
- 2019IMAE for Noise-Robust Learning: Mean Absolute Error Does Not Treat Examples Equally and Gradient Magnitude's Variance Matterscited by 33
- 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
- 2021When and how epochwise double descent happenscited by 20
- 2021Learning with Group Noisecited by 5
- 2024Learning with Noisy Labels: Interconnection of Two Expectation-Maximizationscited by 4
- 2022A Study on the Impact of Data Augmentation for Training Convolutional Neural Networks in the Presence of Noisy Labelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.