mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bootstrapping the Relationship Between Images and Their Clean and Noisy Labels

arXiv 2210.08826 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many state-of-the-art noisy-label learning methods rely on learning mechanisms that estimate the samples' clean labels during training and discard their original noisy labels. However, this approach prevents the learning of the relationship between images, noisy labels and clean labels, which has been shown to be useful when dealing with instance-dependent label noise problems. Furthermore, methods that do aim to learn this relationship require cleanly annotated subsets of data, as well as distillation or multi-faceted models for training. In this paper, we propose a new training algorithm that relies on a simple model to learn the relationship between clean and noisy labels without the need for a cleanly labelled subset of data. Our algorithm follows a 3-stage process, namely: 1) self-supervised pre-training followed by an early-stopping training of the classifier to confidently predict clean labels for a subset of the training set; 2) use the clean set from stage (1) to bootstrap the relationship between images, noisy labels and clean labels, which we exploit for effective relabelling of the remaining training set using semi-supervised learning; and 3) supervised training of the classifier with all relabelled samples from stage (2). By learning this relationship, we achieve state-of-the-art performance in asymmetric and instance-dependent label noise problems.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.

Builds on

48 of 67 references.

References · 48

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  8. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  9. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  10. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  11. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  12. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
36 more
  1. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  2. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  3. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  5. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  6. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  7. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  8. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  9. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
  10. 2017Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning resultscited by 470
  11. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  12. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  13. 2020SCAN: Learning to Classify Images without Labelscited by 351
  14. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  15. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  16. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  17. 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
  18. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  19. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  20. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  21. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  22. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  23. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  24. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  25. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  26. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  27. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  28. 2021Learning Fast Sample Re-weighting Without Reward Datacited by 69
  29. 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 67
  30. 2021NGC: A Unified Framework for Learning with Open-World Noisy Datacited by 58
  31. 2020Deep k-NN for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  32. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  33. 2021PropMix: Hard Sample Filtering and Proportional MixUp for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 17
  34. 2021An Instance-Dependent Simulation Framework for Learning with Label Noisecited by 14
  35. 2020Noisy Concurrent Training for Efficient Learning under Label Noisecited by 13
  36. 2021ScanMix: Learning from Severe Label Noise via Semantic Clustering and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.