mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Noisy Label Processing for Classification: A Survey

arXiv 2404.04159 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, deep neural networks (DNNs) have gained remarkable achievement in computer vision tasks, and the success of DNNs often depends greatly on the richness of data. However, the acquisition process of data and high-quality ground truth requires a lot of manpower and money. In the long, tedious process of data annotation, annotators are prone to make mistakes, resulting in incorrect labels of images, i.e., noisy labels. The emergence of noisy labels is inevitable. Moreover, since research shows that DNNs can easily fit noisy labels, the existence of noisy labels will cause significant damage to the model training process. Therefore, it is crucial to combat noisy labels for computer vision tasks, especially for classification tasks. In this survey, we first comprehensively review the evolution of different deep learning approaches for noisy label combating in the image classification task. In addition, we also review different noise patterns that have been proposed to design robust algorithms. Furthermore, we explore the inner pattern of real-world label noise and propose an algorithm to generate a synthetic label noise pattern guided by real-world data. We test the algorithm on the well-known real-world dataset CIFAR-10N to form a new real-world data-guided synthetic benchmark and evaluate some typical noise-robust methods on the benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2024.

Builds on

59 of 88 references.

References · 59

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  5. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  6. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  7. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  8. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  9. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  10. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  11. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  12. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
38 more
  1. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  2. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  3. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  4. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  5. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  6. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  7. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  8. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  9. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  10. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  11. 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
  12. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
  13. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  14. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 113
  15. 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  16. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  17. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  18. 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
  19. 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
  20. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  21. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  22. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  23. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  24. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  25. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  26. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  27. 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
  28. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  29. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  30. 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 68
  31. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 59
  32. 2021NGC: A Unified Framework for Learning with Open-World Noisy Datacited by 58
  33. 2018Deep Bilevel Learningcited by 49
  34. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  35. 2021Improved Regularization and Robustness for Fine-tuning in Neural Networkscited by 45
  36. 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
  37. 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
  38. 2021Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 34

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.