mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Markets

arXiv 2103.07501 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We design decentralized algorithms for regret minimization in the two-sided matching market with one-sided bandit feedback that significantly improves upon the prior works (Liu et al. 2020a, 2020b, Sankararaman et al. 2020). First, for general markets, for any varepsilon > 0, we design an algorithm that achieves a O(log1+varepsilon(T)) regret to the agent-optimal stable matching, with unknown time horizon T, improving upon the O(log2(T)) regret achieved in (Liu et al. 2020b). Second, we provide the optimal Theta(log(T)) agent-optimal regret for markets satisfying uniqueness consistency -- markets where leaving participants don't alter the original stable matching. Previously, Theta(log(T)) regret was achievable (Sankararaman et al. 2020, Liu et al. 2020b) in the much restricted serial dictatorship setting, when all arms have the same preference over the agents. We propose a phase-based algorithm, wherein each phase, besides deleting the globally communicated dominated arms the agents locally delete arms with which they collide often. This local deletion is pivotal in breaking deadlocks arising from rank heterogeneity of agents across arms. We further demonstrate the superiority of our algorithm over existing works through simulations.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2021.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  2. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 54
  3. 2019Social Learning in Multi Agent Multi Armed Banditscited by 48
  4. 2013Distributed Exploration in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 46
  5. 2018SIC-MMAB: Synchronisation Involves Communication in Multiplayer Multi-Armed Banditscited by 46
  6. 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
  7. 2020Distributed Cooperative Decision Making in Multi-agent Multi-armed Banditscited by 38
  8. 2020The Gossiping Insert-Eliminate Algorithm for Multi-Agent Banditscited by 37
  9. 2020Cooperative Multi-Agent Bandits with Heavy Tailscited by 31
  10. 2016Collaborative Learning of Stochastic Bandits over a Social Networkcited by 29
  11. 2019A Practical Algorithm for Multiplayer Bandits when Arm Means Vary Among Playerscited by 25
  12. 2016Matching while Learningcited by 19
6 more
  1. 2020Learning Strategies in Decentralized Matching Markets under Uncertain Preferencescited by 14
  2. 2020Selfish Robustness and Equilibria in Multi-Player Banditscited by 13
  3. 2018Game of Thrones: Fully Distributed Learning for Multi-Player Banditscited by 12
  4. 2019Multiplayer Bandit Learning, from Competition to Cooperationcited by 12
  5. 2020Competing Bandits: The Perils of Exploration Under Competitioncited by 12
  6. 2020Dominate or Delete: Decentralized Competing Bandits in Serial Dictatorshipcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

29 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  2. 2022A survey on multi-player banditscited by 18
  3. 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
  4. 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 16
  5. 2021Deep Learning for Two-Sided Matchingcited by 15
  6. 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
  7. 2021Decentralized Learning in Online Queuing Systemscited by 7
  8. 2023Competing for Shareable Arms in Multi-Player Multi-Armed Banditscited by 6
  9. 2024Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibilitycited by 6
  10. 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 6
  11. 2023Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraintscited by 5
  12. 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 4
17 more
  1. 2025Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertaintycited by 3
  2. 2024Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approachcited by 2
  3. 2024Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learningcited by 2
  4. 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 2
  5. 2024Competing Bandits in Decentralized Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
  6. 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectivescited by 1
  7. 2026Online Learning and Equilibrium Computation with Ranking Feedbackcited by 1
  8. 2022Double Auctions with Two-sided Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  9. 2024PPA-Game: Characterizing and Learning Competitive Dynamics Among Online Content Creatorscited by 0
  10. 2025Learning in Matching Games with Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  11. 2025Stochastic Matching Bandits with Rare Optimization Updatescited by 0
  12. 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 0
  13. 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Banditscited by 0
  14. 2026Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Marketscited by 0
  15. 2026Learn to Match: Two-Sided Matching with Temporally Extended Feedbackcited by 0
  16. 2026Matching Markets meet Cumulative Prospect Theory: Towards Optimal and Adversarially Robust Learningcited by 0
  17. 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertaintycited by 0