mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Competing Bandits in Matching Markets

arXiv 1906.05363 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2019cs.LG cs.GT cs.MAcited by 54

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stable matching, a classical model for two-sided markets, has long been studied with little consideration for how each side's preferences are learned. With the advent of massive online markets powered by data-driven matching platforms, it has become necessary to better understand the interplay between learning and market objectives. We propose a statistical learning model in which one side of the market does not have a priori knowledge about its preferences for the other side and is required to learn these from stochastic rewards. Our model extends the standard multi-armed bandits framework to multiple players, with the added feature that arms have preferences over players. We study both centralized and decentralized approaches to this problem and show surprising exploration-exploitation trade-offs compared to the single player multi-armed bandits setting.

Key facts. Cited by 54 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 10; 2023: 7; 2024: 9; 2025: 11; 2026: 8.

54 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Misspecified Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 52
  2. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  3. 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 29
  4. 2021Regret, stability & fairness in matching markets with bandit learnerscited by 19
  5. 2022A survey on multi-player banditscited by 18
  6. 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
  7. 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 16
  8. 2021Deep Learning for Two-Sided Matchingcited by 15
  9. 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
  10. 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
  11. 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
  12. 2022Multi-Player Multi-Armed Bandits with Finite Shareable Resources Arms: Learning Algorithms & Applicationscited by 10
38 more
  1. 2021Decentralized Learning in Online Queuing Systemscited by 7
  2. 2023Modeling Recommender Ecosystems: Research Challenges at the Intersection of Mechanism Design, Reinforcement Learning and Generative Modelscited by 7
  3. 2023Competing for Shareable Arms in Multi-Player Multi-Armed Banditscited by 6
  4. 2024Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibilitycited by 6
  5. 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
  6. 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 6
  7. 2023Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraintscited by 5
  8. 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 4
  9. 2023Collaborative Multi-Agent Heterogeneous Multi-Armed Banditscited by 4
  10. 2021Improving Social Welfare While Preserving Autonomy via a Pareto Mediatorcited by 3
  11. 2024Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocationscited by 3
  12. 2025Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertaintycited by 3
  13. 2025Improved Offline Contextual Bandits with Second-Order Bounds: Betting and Freezingcited by 3
  14. 2025Multiplayer Information Asymmetric Bandits in Metric Spacescited by 3
  15. 2025Multiplayer Information Asymmetric Contextual Banditscited by 3
  16. 2022Competing Bandits in Time Varying Matching Marketscited by 2
  17. 2024Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learningcited by 2
  18. 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 2
  19. 2022Interactive Learning with Pricing for Optimal and Stable Allocations in Marketscited by 1
  20. 2023Decentralized Online Learning in Task Assignment Games for Mobile Crowdsensingcited by 1
  21. 2024Competing Bandits in Decentralized Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
  22. 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectivescited by 1
  23. 2025Heterogeneous Data Game: Characterizing the Model Competition Across Multiple Data Sourcescited by 1
  24. 2026Online Learning and Equilibrium Computation with Ranking Feedbackcited by 1
  25. 2021Bandit based centralized matching in two-sided markets for peer to peer lendingcited by 0
  26. 2022Interactive Recommendations for Optimal Allocations in Markets with Constraintscited by 0
  27. 2022Double Auctions with Two-sided Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  28. 2023Near-Optimal Privacy-Preserving Learning for Max-Min Fair Multi-Agent Banditscited by 0
  29. 2024PPA-Game: Characterizing and Learning Competitive Dynamics Among Online Content Creatorscited by 0
  30. 2024Centralized Selection with Preferences in the Presence of Biasescited by 0
  31. 2025Learning in Matching Games with Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  32. 2025Learning Bilateral Team Formation in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  33. 2025Stochastic Matching Bandits with Rare Optimization Updatescited by 0
  34. 2025Bandits with Single-Peaked Preferences and Limited Resourcescited by 0
  35. 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 0
  36. 2026Multi-Agent Combinatorial-Multi-Armed-Bandit framework for the Submodular Welfare Problem under Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  37. 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Banditscited by 0
  38. 2026MenuNet: A Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Matching Marketscited by 0

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)