Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of learning stable matchings with unknown preferences in a decentralized and uncoordinated manner, where "decentralized" means that players make decisions individually without the influence of a central platform, and "uncoordinated" means that players do not need to synchronize their decisions using pre-specified rules. First, we provide a game formulation for this problem with known preferences, where the set of pure Nash equilibria (NE) coincides with the set of stable matchings, and mixed NE can be rounded to a stable matching. Then, we show that for hierarchical markets, applying the exponential weight (EXP) learning algorithm to the stable matching game achieves logarithmic regret in a fully decentralized and uncoordinated fashion. Moreover, we show that EXP converges locally and exponentially fast to a stable matching in general markets. We also introduce another decentralized and uncoordinated learning algorithm that globally converges to a stable matching with arbitrarily high probability. Finally, we provide stronger feedback conditions under which it is possible to drive the market faster toward an approximate stable matching. Our proposed game-theoretic framework bridges the discrete problem of learning stable matchings with the problem of learning NE in continuous-action games.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2024.
Builds on
11 of 31 references.
References · 11
- 2016Learning in games with continuous action sets and unknown payoff functionscited by 78
- 2021Adaptive Learning in Continuous Games: Optimal Regret Bounds and Convergence to Nash Equilibriumcited by 51
- 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
- 2017An Improved Parametrization and Analysis of the EXP3++ Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 43
- 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 29
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 16
- 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
- 2023Converging to Stability in Two-Sided Bandits: The Case of Unknown Preferences on Both Sides of a Matching Marketcited by 5
- 2019Continuous-time Discounted Mirror-Descent Dynamics in Monotone Concave Gamescited by 4
- 2022On the Rate of Convergence of Payoff-based Algorithms to Nash Equilibrium in Strongly Monotone Gamescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.