mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets

arXiv 2307.10890 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The problem of matching markets has been studied for a long time in the literature due to its wide range of applications. Finding a stable matching is a common equilibrium objective in this problem. Since market participants are usually uncertain of their preferences, a rich line of recent works study the online setting where one-side participants (players) learn their unknown preferences from iterative interactions with the other side (arms). Most previous works in this line are only able to derive theoretical guarantees for player-pessimal stable regret, which is defined compared with the players' least-preferred stable matching. However, under the pessimal stable matching, players only obtain the least reward among all stable matchings. To maximize players' profits, player-optimal stable matching would be the most desirable. Though citetbasu21beyond successfully bring an upper bound for player-optimal stable regret, their result can be exponentially large if players' preference gap is small. Whether a polynomial guarantee for this regret exists is a significant but still open problem. In this work, we provide a new algorithm named explore-then-Gale-Shapley (ETGS) and show that the optimal stable regret of each player can be upper bounded by O(Klog T/Delta2) where K is the number of arms, T is the horizon and Delta is the players' minimum preference gap among the first N+1-ranked arms. This result significantly improves previous works which either have a weaker player-pessimal stable matching objective or apply only to markets with special assumptions. When the preferences of participants satisfy some special conditions, our regret upper bound also matches the previously derived lower bound.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2023.

Builds on

11 of 25 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
  2. 2016On Explore-Then-Commit Strategiescited by 47
  3. 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
  4. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  5. 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
  6. 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
  7. 2020Learning Strategies in Decentralized Matching Markets under Uncertain Preferencescited by 14
  8. 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
  9. 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
  10. 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
  11. 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

17 papers.

Sort: