Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of matching markets has been studied for a long time in the literature due to its wide range of applications. Finding a stable matching is a common equilibrium objective in this problem. Since market participants are usually uncertain of their preferences, a rich line of recent works study the online setting where one-side participants (players) learn their unknown preferences from iterative interactions with the other side (arms). Most previous works in this line are only able to derive theoretical guarantees for player-pessimal stable regret, which is defined compared with the players' least-preferred stable matching. However, under the pessimal stable matching, players only obtain the least reward among all stable matchings. To maximize players' profits, player-optimal stable matching would be the most desirable. Though citetbasu21beyond successfully bring an upper bound for player-optimal stable regret, their result can be exponentially large if players' preference gap is small. Whether a polynomial guarantee for this regret exists is a significant but still open problem. In this work, we provide a new algorithm named explore-then-Gale-Shapley (ETGS) and show that the optimal stable regret of each player can be upper bounded by O(Klog T/Delta2) where K is the number of arms, T is the horizon and Delta is the players' minimum preference gap among the first N+1-ranked arms. This result significantly improves previous works which either have a weaker player-pessimal stable matching objective or apply only to markets with special assumptions. When the preferences of participants satisfy some special conditions, our regret upper bound also matches the previously derived lower bound.
Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2023.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
- 2016On Explore-Then-Commit Strategiescited by 47
- 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
- 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
- 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
- 2020Learning Strategies in Decentralized Matching Markets under Uncertain Preferencescited by 14
- 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
- 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
- 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.
17 papers.
Sort:
- 2024Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibilitycited by 7
- 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 7
- 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
- 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 4
- 2024Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approachcited by 2
- 2024Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learningcited by 2
- 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectivescited by 2
- 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertaintycited by 2
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 1
- 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Banditscited by 1
- 2026Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
- 2025Learning with Limited Shared Information in Multi-agent Multi-armed Banditcited by 0
5 more
- 2025Learning in Matching Games with Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
- 2025Stochastic Matching Bandits with Rare Optimization Updatescited by 0
- 2026Learn to Match: Two-Sided Matching with Temporally Extended Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026Matching Markets meet Cumulative Prospect Theory: Towards Optimal and Adversarially Robust Learningcited by 0
- 2026Exact Regret Frontiers and Externality Scheduling in Centralized Serial-Dictatorship Banditscited by 0
- 2026Exact Regret Frontiers and Externality Scheduling in Centralized Serial-Dictatorship Bandits17 Sep 2026
- 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertainty6 Jul 2026
- 2026Matching Markets meet Cumulative Prospect Theory: Towards Optimal and Adversarially Robust Learning18 Jun 2026
- 2026Learn to Match: Two-Sided Matching with Temporally Extended Feedback4 Jun 2026
- 2026Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Markets27 May 2026
- 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Bandits20 Mar 2026
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorship7 Dec 2025
- 2025Stochastic Matching Bandits with Rare Optimization Updates4 Sep 2025
- 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stability19 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning in Matching Games with Bandit Feedback4 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning with Limited Shared Information in Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandit21 Feb 2025
- 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectives30 Nov 2024
5 more
- 2024Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learning5 Nov 2024
- 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learning6 Oct 2024
- 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Markets16 Aug 2024
- 2024Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approach31 Jul 2024
- 2024Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibility3 Jan 2024
- 2024Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibilitycited by 7
- 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 7
- 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
- 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 4
- 2024Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approachcited by 2
- 2024Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learningcited by 2
- 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectivescited by 2
- 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertaintycited by 2
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 1
- 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Banditscited by 1
- 2026Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
- 2025Learning with Limited Shared Information in Multi-agent Multi-armed Banditcited by 0
12 most cited of 17 All 17 (JSON)
- 2026Exact Regret Frontiers and Externality Scheduling in Centralized Serial-Dictatorship Bandits17 Sep 2026
- 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertainty6 Jul 2026
- 2026Matching Markets meet Cumulative Prospect Theory: Towards Optimal and Adversarially Robust Learning18 Jun 2026
- 2026Learn to Match: Two-Sided Matching with Temporally Extended Feedback4 Jun 2026
- 2026Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Markets27 May 2026
- 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Bandits20 Mar 2026
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorship7 Dec 2025
- 2025Stochastic Matching Bandits with Rare Optimization Updates4 Sep 2025
- 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stability19 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning in Matching Games with Bandit Feedback4 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning with Limited Shared Information in Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandit21 Feb 2025
- 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectives30 Nov 2024
12 newest of 17 All 17 (JSON)