mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Markets

arXiv 2012.07348 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.GT cs.MAcited by 46

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study two-sided matching markets in which one side of the market (the players) does not have a priori knowledge about its preferences for the other side (the arms) and is required to learn its preferences from experience. Also, we assume the players have no direct means of communication. This model extends the standard stochastic multi-armed bandit framework to a decentralized multiple player setting with competition. We introduce a new algorithm for this setting that, over a time horizon T, attains O(log(T)) stable regret when preferences of the arms over players are shared, and O(log(T)2) regret when there are no assumptions on the preferences on either side. Moreover, in the setting where a single player may deviate, we show that the algorithm is incentive compatible whenever the arms' preferences are shared, but not necessarily so when preferences are fully general.

Key facts. Cited by 46 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 8; 2023: 6; 2024: 9; 2025: 7; 2026: 8.

46 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  2. 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
  3. 2021Regret, stability & fairness in matching markets with bandit learnerscited by 20
  4. 2022A survey on multi-player banditscited by 19
  5. 2023Contextual Combinatorial Bandits with Probabilistically Triggered Armscited by 18
  6. 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 17
  7. 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
  8. 2021Deep Learning for Two-Sided Matchingcited by 15
  9. 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
  10. 2023Auditing for Human Expertisecited by 12
  11. 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
  12. 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
34 more
  1. 2021Decentralized Learning in Online Queuing Systemscited by 8
  2. 2024Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibilitycited by 7
  3. 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 7
  4. 2021An Instance-Dependent Analysis for the Cooperative Multi-Player Multi-Armed Banditcited by 6
  5. 2023Competing for Shareable Arms in Multi-Player Multi-Armed Banditscited by 6
  6. 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
  7. 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 5
  8. 2023Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraintscited by 5
  9. 2025Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertaintycited by 5
  10. 2021Cooperative Online Learning with Feedback Graphscited by 4
  11. 2022Pessimism meets VCG: Learning Dynamic Mechanism Design via Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  12. 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 4
  13. 2022Competing Bandits in Time Varying Matching Marketscited by 3
  14. 2025Multiplayer Information Asymmetric Bandits in Metric Spacescited by 3
  15. 2025Multiplayer Information Asymmetric Contextual Banditscited by 3
  16. 2024Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approachcited by 2
  17. 2024Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learningcited by 2
  18. 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectivescited by 2
  19. 2026Online Learning and Equilibrium Computation with Ranking Feedbackcited by 2
  20. 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertaintycited by 2
  21. 2023Decentralized Online Learning in Task Assignment Games for Mobile Crowdsensingcited by 1
  22. 2024Competing Bandits in Decentralized Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
  23. 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 1
  24. 2026Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
  25. 2022Double Auctions with Two-sided Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  26. 2024PPA-Game: Characterizing and Learning Competitive Dynamics Among Online Content Creatorscited by 0
  27. 2024Centralized Selection with Preferences in the Presence of Biasescited by 0
  28. 2025Learning in Matching Games with Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  29. 2025Stochastic Matching Bandits with Rare Optimization Updatescited by 0
  30. 2026MenuNet: A Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Matching Marketscited by 0
  31. 2026Learn to Match: Two-Sided Matching with Temporally Extended Feedbackcited by 0
  32. 2026Matching Markets meet Cumulative Prospect Theory: Towards Optimal and Adversarially Robust Learningcited by 0
  33. 2026A Linear Matching Bandit Approach to Online Multi-Human Multi-Robot Teamingcited by 0
  34. 2026From Preference to Reciprocity: Decentralized Matching with Empirically Grounded LLM-agent Based Modelingcited by 0