Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Markets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding complex dynamics of two-sided online matching markets, where the demand-side agents compete to match with the supply-side (arms), has recently received substantial interest. To that end, in this paper, we introduce the framework of decentralized two-sided matching market under non stationary (dynamic) environments. We adhere to the serial dictatorship setting, where the demand-side agents have unknown and different preferences over the supply-side (arms), but the arms have fixed and known preference over the agents. We propose and analyze a decentralized and asynchronous learning algorithm, namely Decentralized Non-stationary Competing Bandits (textttDNCB), where the agents play (restrictive) successive elimination type learning algorithms to learn their preference over the arms. The complexity in understanding such a system stems from the fact that the competing bandits choose their actions in an asynchronous fashion, and the lower ranked agents only get to learn from a set of arms, not dominated by the higher ranked agents, which leads to forced exploration. With carefully defined complexity parameters, we characterize this forced exploration and obtain sub-linear (logarithmic) regret of textttDNCB. Furthermore, we validate our theoretical findings via experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2022.
Builds on
10 of 34 references.
References · 10
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
- 2017Efficient Contextual Bandits in Non-stationary Worldscited by 62
- 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
- 2017A Change-Detection based Framework for Piecewise-stationary Multi-Armed Bandit Problemcited by 49
- 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
- 2016Matching while Learningcited by 19
- 2018On Abruptly-Changing and Slowly-Varying Multiarmed Bandit Problemscited by 15
- 2020Learning Strategies in Decentralized Matching Markets under Uncertain Preferencescited by 14
- 2021On Slowly-varying Non-stationary Banditscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 17
- 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
- 2022Competing Bandits in Time Varying Matching Marketscited by 3
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 1
- 2026DataCupid: Stable Matching Repair for Training Data Acquisition with Delayed Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026DataCupid: Stable Matching Repair for Training Data Acquisition with Delayed Feedback9 Oct 2026
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorship7 Dec 2025
- 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Markets16 Aug 2024
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets20 Jul 2023
- 2022Competing Bandits in Time Varying Matching Markets21 Oct 2022