Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorship
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of two-sided matching markets is well-studied in computer science and economics, owing to its diverse applications across numerous domains. Since market participants are usually uncertain about their preferences in various online matching platforms, an emerging line of research is dedicated to the online setting where one-side participants (players) learn their unknown preferences through multiple rounds of interactions with the other side (arms). Sankararaman et al. provide an Omegaleft( fracNlog(T)Delta2 + fracKlog(T)Delta right) regret lower bound for this problem under serial dictatorship assumption, where N is the number of players, K (≥ N) is the number of arms, Delta is the minimum reward gap across players and arms, and T is the time horizon. Serial dictatorship assumes arms have the same preferences, which is common in reality when one side participants have a unified evaluation standard. Recently, the work of Kong and Li proposes the ET-GS algorithm and achieves an Oleft( fracKlog(T)Delta2 right) regret upper bound, which is the best upper bound attained so far. Nonetheless, a gap between the lower and upper bounds, ranging from N to K, persists. It remains unclear whether the lower bound or the upper bound needs to be improved. In this paper, we propose a multi-level successive selection algorithm that obtains an Oleft( fracNlog(T)Delta2 + fracKlog(T)Delta right) regret bound when the market satisfies serial dictatorship. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to propose an algorithm that matches the lower bound in the problem of matching markets with bandits.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2025.
Builds on
15 of 25 references.
References · 15
- 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
- 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
- 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
- 2021Regret, stability & fairness in matching markets with bandit learnerscited by 20
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 17
- 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
- 2020Learning Strategies in Decentralized Matching Markets under Uncertain Preferencescited by 14
- 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
- 2021Optimizing Rankings for Recommendation in Matching Marketscited by 12
- 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.