Learning Strategies in Decentralized Matching Markets under Uncertain Preferences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of decision-making in the setting of a scarcity of shared resources when the preferences of agents are unknown a priori and must be learned from data. Taking the two-sided matching market as a running example, we focus on the decentralized setting, where agents do not share their learned preferences with a central authority. Our approach is based on the representation of preferences in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, and a learning algorithm for preferences that accounts for uncertainty due to the competition among the agents in the market. Under regularity conditions, we show that our estimator of preferences converges at a minimax optimal rate. Given this result, we derive optimal strategies that maximize agents' expected payoffs and we calibrate the uncertain state by taking opportunity costs into account. We also derive an incentive-compatibility property and show that the outcome from the learned strategies has a stability property. Finally, we prove a fairness property that asserts that there exists no justified envy according to the learned strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 29
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 16
- 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
- 2022Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Marketscited by 5
- 2023Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraintscited by 5
- 2022Pessimism meets VCG: Learning Dynamic Mechanism Design via Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 4
- 2024Online Auction Design Using Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification with Applications to E-Commercecited by 1
- 2024Wasserstein gradient flow for optimal probability measure decompositioncited by 1
- 2025Learn then Decide: A Learning Approach for Designing Data Marketplacescited by 1
- 2023An ODE Model for Dynamic Matching in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 0
- 2026From Preference to Reciprocity: Decentralized Matching with Empirically Grounded LLM-agent Based Modeling28 Sep 2026
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorship7 Dec 2025
- 2025Learn then Decide: A Learning Approach for Designing Data Marketplaces13 Mar 2025
- 2024Wasserstein gradient flow for optimal probability measure decomposition3 Jun 2024
- 2024Online Auction Design Using Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification with Applications to E-Commerce11 May 2024
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets20 Jul 2023
- 2023An ODE Model for Dynamic Matching in Heterogeneous Networks20 Feb 2023
- 2023Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraints24 Jan 2023
- 2022Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Markets23 Nov 2022
- 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Markets31 May 2022
- 2022Pessimism meets VCG: Learning Dynamic Mechanism Design via Offline Reinforcement Learning5 May 2022
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets26 Apr 2022
2 more
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 29
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 16
- 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
- 2022Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Marketscited by 5
- 2023Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraintscited by 5
- 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 4
- 2024Online Auction Design Using Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification with Applications to E-Commercecited by 1
- 2024Wasserstein gradient flow for optimal probability measure decompositioncited by 1
- 2025Learn then Decide: A Learning Approach for Designing Data Marketplacescited by 1
- 2023An ODE Model for Dynamic Matching in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 0
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 0
- 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorship7 Dec 2025
- 2025Learn then Decide: A Learning Approach for Designing Data Marketplaces13 Mar 2025
- 2024Wasserstein gradient flow for optimal probability measure decomposition3 Jun 2024
- 2024Online Auction Design Using Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification with Applications to E-Commerce11 May 2024
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets20 Jul 2023
- 2023An ODE Model for Dynamic Matching in Heterogeneous Networks20 Feb 2023
- 2023Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraints24 Jan 2023
- 2022Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Markets23 Nov 2022
- 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Markets31 May 2022
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets26 Apr 2022
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Markets12 Mar 2021
- 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Markets13 Feb 2021