mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Markets

arXiv 2605.28290 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.LG cs.GT stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study bandit learning in matching markets, where players and arms constitute the two market sides, and the players' utilities are linear in the arm contexts. In each round, new arms arrive with observable contexts. Then, the algorithm matches them to players, aiming to minimize each player's regret against a stable matching benchmark. This contextual structure creates significant complexity: subtle context shifts can slightly alter one player's utility while completely reconfiguring the underlying benchmark, causing large regret spikes for others. We address this in two settings: stochastic contexts, drawn from a latent distribution, and adversarial contexts, which may be arbitrary. For the stochastic case, we introduce a novel minimum preference gap to capture learning difficulty and provide a fully adaptive algorithm with an instance-dependent poly-logarithmic regret upper bound. We also establish matching instance-independent regret upper and lower bounds under a mild distributional assumption. For the adversarial setting, we propose a tractable regret notion that remains valid under arbitrary contexts and achieves an instance-independent sublinear regret bound via an adaptive algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 39 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
  2. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
  3. 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
  4. 2019Adaptive Exploration in Linear Contextual Banditcited by 43
  5. 2014Efficient Learning in Large-Scale Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 36
  6. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  7. 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
  8. 2020The Elliptical Potential Lemma Revisitedcited by 23
  9. 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 17
  10. 2024Improved Algorithms for Contextual Dynamic Pricingcited by 11
  11. 2021Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Contextual Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Linear Payoff Functionscited by 9
  12. 2017Adaptive Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff for Opportunistic Banditscited by 8
5 more
  1. 2022Dynamic Matching Bandit For Two-Sided Online Marketscited by 5
  2. 2022Competing Bandits in Time Varying Matching Marketscited by 3
  3. 2024A Contextual Combinatorial Bandit Approach to Negotiationcited by 2
  4. 2024Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learningcited by 2
  5. 2025Bandit Learning in Housing Marketscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.