Learn to Match: Two-Sided Matching with Temporally Extended Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Two-sided matching markets often involve information that unfolds over time through interviews, repeated interaction, learning, and separation. Existing matching models typically reduce this process to immediate sub-Gaussian feedback about fixed preferences, missing settings where payoff-relevant information is revealed gradually and changes future matching decisions. We introduce a framework with temporally extended feedback, that formulates two-sided matching as a partially observable Markov game with costly pre-match screening, noisy post-match observations, evolving latent profiles, and endogenous continuation or dissolution. We instantiate this framework in Learn2Match, a multi-agent reinforcement-learning benchmark for dynamic matching markets. Learn2Match supports decentralized decision making over whom to interview, whom to match with, and when to dissolve a match, while evaluating policies using regret, social welfare, and an information-friction loss that measures the welfare gap caused by incomplete revelation of latent preferences. We find that independent PPO achieves higher cumulative social welfare and lower cumulative regret than the bandit-style CA-ETC baseline under temporally extended feedback, demonstrating the promise of MARL for dynamic matching markets. However, PPO still incurs higher information-friction loss, revealing that end-to-end MARL does not yet provide the coordinated exploration structure of matching-bandit methods. These results position Learn2Match as a benchmark for developing the next generation of matching-market algorithms: methods that are adaptive like RL agents, statistically disciplined like bandit algorithms, and structurally aware like stable-matching mechanisms. Please refer to https://sites.google.com/view/learn-to-match/home for the official website and the code link.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 59 references.
References · 24
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
- 2020The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policiescited by 75
- 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
- 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
- 2025LLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacracited by 22
- 2019Tight Regret Bounds for Infinite-armed Linear Contextual Banditscited by 17
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 17
- 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
12 more
- 2023A Better Match for Drivers and Riders: Reinforcement Learning at Lyftcited by 9
- 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 7
- 2014Online Dating Recommendations: Matching Markets and Learning Preferencescited by 6
- 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
- 2021We Know What You Want: An Advertising Strategy Recommender System for Online Advertisingcited by 5
- 2022Dynamic Matching Bandit For Two-Sided Online Marketscited by 5
- 2023Converging to Stability in Two-Sided Bandits: The Case of Unknown Preferences on Both Sides of a Matching Marketcited by 5
- 2025Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertaintycited by 5
- 2021Designing Approximately Optimal Search on Matching Platformscited by 2
- 2024Competing Bandits in Decentralized Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
- 2025From signaling to interviews in random matching marketscited by 1
- 2026Efficient Interview Scheduling for Stable Matchingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Preference to Reciprocity: Decentralized Matching with Empirically Grounded LLM-agent Based Modeling
- 2025Online Matching via Reinforcement Learning: An Expert Policy Orchestration Strategy
- 2026Matching Multiple Experts: On the Exploitability of Multi-Agent Imitation Learning
- 2025From Individual Learning to Market Equilibrium: Correcting Structural and Parametric Biases in RL Simulations of Economic Models
- 2026Persistent Partners Raise Prices Among Learning Agents
- 2023Query-Policy Misalignment in Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Evolving in the Agent Jungle via History-Informed Opponent Awareness
- 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective