mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Double Auctions with Two-sided Bandit Feedback

arXiv 2208.06536 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2022cs.LG cs.GTcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Double Auction enables decentralized transfer of goods between multiple buyers and sellers, thus underpinning functioning of many online marketplaces. Buyers and sellers compete in these markets through bidding, but do not often know their own valuation a-priori. As the allocation and pricing happens through bids, the profitability of participants, hence sustainability of such markets, depends crucially on learning respective valuations through repeated interactions. We initiate the study of Double Auction markets under bandit feedback on both buyers' and sellers' side. We show with confidence bound based bidding, and `Average Pricing' there is an efficient price discovery among the participants. In particular, the regret on combined valuation of the buyers and the sellers -- a.k.a. the social regret -- is O(log(T)/Delta) in T rounds, where Delta is the minimum price gap. Moreover, the buyers and sellers exchanging goods attain O(√T) regret, individually. The buyers and sellers who do not benefit from exchange in turn only experience O(logT/ Delta) regret individually in T rounds. We augment our upper bound by showing that ω(√T) individual regret, and ω(logT) social regret is unattainable in certain Double Auction markets. Our paper is the first to provide decentralized learning algorithms in a two-sided market where both sides have uncertain preference that need to be learned.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2022.

Builds on

13 of 43 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
  2. 2015The Sample Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 48
  3. 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
  4. 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
  5. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  6. 2020Optimal No-regret Learning in Repeated First-price Auctionscited by 33
  7. 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
  8. 2015Learning in Auctions: Regret is Hard, Envy is Easycited by 23
  9. 2021Regret, stability & fairness in matching markets with bandit learnerscited by 20
  10. 2021A Regret Analysis of Bilateral Tradecited by 19
  11. 2013Learning Theory and Algorithms for Revenue Optimization in Second-Price Auctions with Reservecited by 16
  12. 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
1 more
  1. 2020Real-Time Optimisation for Online Learning in Auctionscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.