mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Matching while Learning

arXiv 1603.04549 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2016cs.LG cs.DS stat.MEcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem faced by a service platform that needs to match limited supply with demand but also to learn the attributes of new users in order to match them better in the future. We introduce a benchmark model with heterogeneous "workers" (demand) and a limited supply of "jobs" that arrive over time. Job types are known to the platform, but worker types are unknown and must be learned by observing match outcomes. Workers depart after performing a certain number of jobs. The expected payoff from a match depends on the pair of types and the goal is to maximize the steady-state rate of accumulation of payoff. Though we use terminology inspired by labor markets, our framework applies more broadly to platforms where a limited supply of heterogeneous products is matched to users over time. Our main contribution is a complete characterization of the structure of the optimal policy in the limit that each worker performs many jobs. The platform faces a trade-off for each worker between myopically maximizing payoffs (exploitation) and learning the type of the worker (exploration). This creates a multitude of multi-armed bandit problems, one for each worker, coupled together by the constraint on availability of jobs of different types (capacity constraints). We find that the platform should estimate a shadow price for each job type, and use the payoffs adjusted by these prices, first, to determine its learning goals and then, for each worker, (i) to balance learning with payoffs during the "exploration phase," and (ii) to myopically match after it has achieved its learning goals during the "exploitation phase."

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  2. 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 29
  3. 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
  4. 2021Learning and Information in Stochastic Networks and Queuescited by 8
  5. 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
  6. 2022A new perspective on classification: optimally allocating limited resources to uncertain taskscited by 5
  7. 2022Decentralized Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Marketscited by 4
  8. 2021Improving Social Welfare While Preserving Autonomy via a Pareto Mediatorcited by 3
  9. 2024Learning payoffs while routing in skill-based queuescited by 2
  10. 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 2
  11. 2021Bandits with Dynamic Arm-acquisition Costscited by 1
  12. 2022A Scalable Recommendation Engine for New Users and Itemscited by 1
7 more
  1. 2022Interactive Learning with Pricing for Optimal and Stable Allocations in Marketscited by 1
  2. 2021Bandit based centralized matching in two-sided markets for peer to peer lendingcited by 0
  3. 2021Learning to Schedule in Parallel-Server Queues with Stochastic Bilinear Rewardscited by 0
  4. 2023Complexity Analysis of a Countable-armed Bandit Problemcited by 0
  5. 2024Safe and Efficient Online Convex Optimization with Linear Budget Constraints and Partial Feedbackcited by 0
  6. 2025Linear Bandits beyond Inner Product Spaces, the case of Bandit Optimal Transportcited by 0
  7. 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Banditscited by 0