mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dominate or Delete: Decentralized Competing Bandits in Serial Dictatorship

arXiv 2006.15166 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2020cs.LG cs.DS cs.GTcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online learning in a two-sided matching market, with demand side agents continuously competing to be matched with supply side (arms), abstracts the complex interactions under partial information on matching platforms (e.g. UpWork, TaskRabbit). We study the decentralized serial dictatorship setting, a two-sided matching market where the demand side agents have unknown and heterogeneous valuation over the supply side (arms), while the arms have known uniform preference over the demand side (agents). We design the first decentralized algorithm -- UCB with Decentralized Dominant-arm Deletion (UCB-D3), for the agents, that does not require any knowledge of reward gaps or time horizon. UCB-D3 works in phases, where in each phase, agents delete dominated arms -- the arms preferred by higher ranked agents, and play only from the non-dominated arms according to the UCB. At the end of the phase, agents broadcast in a decentralized fashion, their estimated preferred arms through em pure exploitation. We prove both, a new regret lower bound for the decentralized serial dictatorship model, and that UCB-D3 is order optimal.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.