Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study bandit learning in matching markets with two-sided reward uncertainty, extending prior research primarily focused on single-sided uncertainty. Leveraging the concept of `super-stability' from Irving (1994), we demonstrate the advantage of the Extended Gale-Shapley (GS) algorithm over the standard GS algorithm in achieving true stable matchings under incomplete information. By employing the Extended GS algorithm, our centralized algorithm attains a logarithmic pessimal stable regret dependent on an instance-dependent admissible gap parameter. This algorithm is further adapted to a decentralized setting with a constant regret increase. Finally, we establish a novel centralized instance-dependent lower bound for binary stable regret, elucidating the roles of the admissible gap and super-stable matching in characterizing the complexity of stable matching with bandit feedback.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2025.
Builds on
13 of 28 references.
References · 13
- 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
- 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
- 2017Minimal Exploration in Structured Stochastic Banditscited by 41
- 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
- 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 30
- 2016Matching while Learningcited by 19
- 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 17
- 2022Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Marketscited by 11
- 2024Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibilitycited by 7
- 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 7
- 2024Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Marketscited by 6
- 2023Converging to Stability in Two-Sided Bandits: The Case of Unknown Preferences on Both Sides of a Matching Marketcited by 5
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertaintycited by 2
- 2026MenuNet: A Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Matching Marketscited by 0
- 2026Exact Regret Frontiers and Externality Scheduling in Centralized Serial-Dictatorship Banditscited by 0
- 2026DataCupid: Stable Matching Repair for Training Data Acquisition with Delayed Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026DataCupid: Stable Matching Repair for Training Data Acquisition with Delayed Feedback9 Oct 2026
- 2026Exact Regret Frontiers and Externality Scheduling in Centralized Serial-Dictatorship Bandits17 Sep 2026
- 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertainty6 Jul 2026
- 2026MenuNet: A Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Matching Markets4 May 2026