mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraints

arXiv 2301.10230 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2023stat.ML cs.GT cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a new recommendation algorithm for addressing the problem of two-sided online matching markets with complementary preferences and quota constraints, where agents' preferences are unknown a priori and must be learned from data. The presence of mixed quota and complementary preferences constraints can lead to instability in the matching process, making this problem challenging to solve. To overcome this challenge, we formulate the problem as a bandit learning framework and propose the Multi-agent Multi-type Thompson Sampling (MMTS) algorithm. The algorithm combines the strengths of Thompson Sampling for exploration with a new double matching technique to provide a stable matching outcome. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of MMTS as it can achieve stability and has a total widetildeO(Q√KmaxT)-Bayesian regret with high probability, which exhibits linearity with respect to the total firm's quota Q, the square root of the maximum size of available type workers √Kmax and time horizon T. In addition, simulation studies also demonstrate MMTS's effectiveness in various settings. We provide code used in our experiments urlhttps://github.com/Likelyt/Double-Matching.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2023.

Builds on

21 of 64 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
  2. 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
  3. 2017Online Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Gamescited by 67
  4. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 54
  5. 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
  6. 2015Optimal Regret Analysis of Thompson Sampling in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problem with Multiple Playscited by 38
  7. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  8. 2021Beyond log2(T) Regret for Decentralized Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 29
  9. 2019Convergence of Learning Dynamics in Stackelberg Gamescited by 28
  10. 2021Can Reinforcement Learning Find Stackelberg-Nash Equilibria in General-Sum Markov Games with Myopic Followers?cited by 24
  11. 2021Regret, stability & fairness in matching markets with bandit learnerscited by 19
  12. 2022Competition, Alignment, and Equilibria in Digital Marketplacescited by 17
9 more
  1. 2022Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Marketscited by 16
  2. 2020Learning Strategies in Decentralized Matching Markets under Uncertain Preferencescited by 14
  3. 2021Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 12
  4. 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
  5. 2018Finite-Sample Analysis For Decentralized Batch Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning With Networked Agentscited by 5
  6. 2022Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Marketscited by 5
  7. 2022A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Off-Policy Evaluation in Two-sided Marketscited by 4
  8. 2021Designing Approximately Optimal Search on Matching Platformscited by 2
  9. 2020A Fine-Grained View on Stable Many-To-One Matching Problems with Lower and Upper Quotascited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4.

5 papers.