mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models

arXiv 2410.13928 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 106

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While the activations of neurons in deep neural networks usually do not have a simple human-understandable interpretation, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can be used to transform these activations into a higher-dimensional latent space which may be more easily interpretable. However, these SAEs can have millions of distinct latent features, making it infeasible for humans to manually interpret each one. In this work, we build an open-source automated pipeline to generate and evaluate natural language explanations for SAE features using LLMs. We test our framework on SAEs of varying sizes, activation functions, and losses, trained on two different open-weight LLMs. We introduce five new techniques to score the quality of explanations that are cheaper to run than the previous state of the art. One of these techniques, intervention scoring, evaluates the interpretability of the effects of intervening on a feature, which we find explains features that are not recalled by existing methods. We propose guidelines for generating better explanations that remain valid for a broader set of activating contexts, and discuss pitfalls with existing scoring techniques. We use our explanations to measure the semantic similarity of independently trained SAEs, and find that SAEs trained on nearby layers of the residual stream are highly similar. Our large-scale analysis confirms that SAE latents are indeed much more interpretable than neurons, even when neurons are sparsified using top-k postprocessing. Our code is available at https://github.com/EleutherAI/sae-auto-interp, and our explanations are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/EleutherAI/autointerpexplanations.

Key facts. Cited by 106 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  3. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
  4. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  5. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
  6. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
  7. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  8. 2022Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetriescited by 460
  9. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
  10. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
  11. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
  12. 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
10 more
  1. 2022Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communicationcited by 175
  2. 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
  3. 2018Invariance, Causality and Robustnesscited by 123
  4. 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Modelscited by 100
  5. 2024SelfIE: Self-Interpretation of Large Language Model Embeddingscited by 63
  6. 2024A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agentcited by 62
  7. 2023Explaining black box text modules in natural language with language modelscited by 61
  8. 2023Rigorously Assessing Natural Language Explanations of Neuronscited by 44
  9. 2024CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of Neuronscited by 17
  10. 2023The Importance of Prompt Tuning for Automated Neuron Explanationscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 48; 2026: 57.

106 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 136
  2. 2024Steering Language Model Refusal with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 89
  3. 2025SAeUron: Interpretable Concept Unlearning in Diffusion Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 75
  4. 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 43
  5. 2026When Models Manipulate Manifolds: The Geometry of a Counting Taskcited by 43
  6. 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 41
  7. 2025Steering Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Concept Ablation Fine-Tuningcited by 34
  8. 2025Interpretable Steering of Large Language Models with Feature Guided Activation Additionscited by 32
  9. 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuningcited by 31
  10. 2025Training Language Models to Explain Their Own Computationscited by 27
  11. 2025Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically Interpretablecited by 22
  12. 2025Dense SAE Latents Are Features, Not Bugscited by 17
38 more
  1. 2026Qwen-Scope: Turning Sparse Features into Development Tools for Large Language Modelscited by 15
  2. 2025Position: Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in SAEscited by 14
  3. 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedycited by 12
  4. 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 11
  5. 2026Shaping capabilities with token-level data filteringcited by 11
  6. 2025Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticitycited by 10
  7. 2026From Directions to Regions: Decomposing Activations in Language Models via Local Geometrycited by 10
  8. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?cited by 10
  9. 2025Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activationscited by 9
  10. 2025Capturing Polysemanticity with PRISM: A Multi-Concept Feature Description Frameworkcited by 9
  11. 2025Does higher interpretability imply better utility? A Pairwise Analysis on Sparse Autoencoderscited by 9
  12. 2025How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patternscited by 8
  13. 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalisecited by 8
  14. 2025Model Directions, Not Words: Mechanistic Topic Models Using Sparse Autoencoderscited by 7
  15. 2025OrtSAE: Orthogonal Sparse Autoencoders Uncover Atomic Featurescited by 7
  16. 2026SynthSAEBench: Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Scalable Realistic Synthetic Datacited by 7
  17. 2025Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse Autoencoderscited by 6
  18. 2025Superposition as Lossy Compression: Measure with Sparse Autoencoders and Connect to Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 6
  19. 2026DLM-Scope: Mechanistic Interpretability of Diffusion Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 6
  20. 2026Circuit Tracing in Vision-Language Models: Understanding the Internal Mechanisms of Multimodal Thinkingcited by 6
  21. 2025Evaluating SAE interpretability without explanationscited by 5
  22. 2025Teach Old SAEs New Domain Tricks with Boostingcited by 5
  23. 2025LLM Interpretability with Identifiable Temporal-Instantaneous Representationcited by 4
  24. 2025Measuring Sparse Autoencoder Feature Sensitivitycited by 4
  25. 2025Circuit Insights: Towards Interpretability Beyond Activationscited by 4
  26. 2026Tracing Moral Foundations in Large Language Modelscited by 4
  27. 2025Ensembling Sparse Autoencoderscited by 3
  28. 2025Inference-Time Decomposition of Activations (ITDA): A Scalable Approach to Interpreting Large Language Modelscited by 3
  29. 2025The Anatomy of Alignment: Decomposing Preference Optimization by Steering Sparse Featurescited by 3
  30. 2025Binary Sparse Coding for Interpretabilitycited by 3
  31. 2025Atlas-Alignment: Making Interpretability Transferable Across Language Modelscited by 3
  32. 2026Towards Worst-Case Guarantees with Scale-Aware Interpretabilitycited by 3
  33. 2026Automated Interpretability and Feature Discovery in Language Models with Agentscited by 3
  34. 2026Tree SAE: Learning Hierarchical Feature Structures in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 3
  35. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?cited by 3
  36. 2025Evaluating Explanations: An Explanatory Virtues Framework for Mechanistic Interpretability -- The Strange Science Part I.iicited by 2
  37. 2025Resurrecting the Salmon: Rethinking Mechanistic Interpretability with Domain-Specific Sparse Autoencoderscited by 2
  38. 2025Semantic Regexes: Auto-Interpreting LLM Features with a Structured Languagecited by 2

50 most cited of 106 All 106 (JSON)