mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ensembling Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2505.16077 ↗First posted 21 May 2025cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are used to decompose neural network activations into human-interpretable features. Typically, features learned by a single SAE are used for downstream applications. However, it has recently been shown that a single SAE captures only a limited subset of features that can be extracted from the activation space. Motivated by this limitation, we introduce and formalize SAE ensembles. Furthermore, we propose to ensemble multiple SAEs through naive bagging and boosting. In naive bagging, SAEs trained with different weight initializations are ensembled, whereas in boosting SAEs sequentially trained to minimize the residual error are ensembled. Theoretically, naive bagging and boosting are justified as approaches to reduce reconstruction error. Empirically, we evaluate our ensemble approaches with three settings of language models and SAE architectures. Our empirical results demonstrate that, compared to an expanded SAE that matches the number of features in the ensemble, ensembling SAEs improves the reconstruction of language model activations along with SAE stability. Additionally, on downstream tasks such as concept detection and spurious correlation removal, SAE ensembles achieve better performance, showing improved practical utility.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2025.

Builds on

29 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability12 Mar
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoders for Hypothesis Generation5 Feb
  3. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features28 Jan
  4. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language models25 Oct
  5. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models17 Oct
  6. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders22 Sep
  7. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
  8. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
  9. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders24 Apr
  10. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 19

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  3. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  4. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  5. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  6. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  7. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
  8. 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Modelscited by 187
  9. 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
  10. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  11. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 109
  12. 2024Steering Language Model Refusal with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 95
7 more
  1. 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 88
  3. 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 73
  4. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 61
  5. 2024Efficient Dictionary Learning with Switch Sparse Autoencoderscited by 39
  6. 2024Decoding Dark Matter: Specialized Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Rare Concepts in Foundation Modelscited by 16
  7. 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Taskscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?
  2. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing
  3. 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
  4. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
  5. 2026Stable and Steerable Sparse Autoencoders with Weight Regularization
  6. 2026Discovering Millions of Interpretable Features with Sparse Autoencoders
  7. 2026Toward Identifiable Sparse Autoencoders
  8. 2025Revisiting End-To-End Sparse Autoencoder Training: A Short Finetune Is All You Need