mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inference-Time Decomposition of Activations (ITDA): A Scalable Approach to Interpreting Large Language Models

arXiv 2505.17769 ↗First posted 23 May 2025cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular method for decomposing Large Langage Models (LLM) activations into interpretable latents. However, due to their substantial training cost, most academic research uses open-source SAEs which are only available for a restricted set of models of up to 27B parameters. SAE latents are also learned from a dataset of activations, which means they do not transfer between models. Motivated by relative representation similarity measures, we introduce Inference-Time Decomposition of Activations (ITDA) models, an alternative method for decomposing language model activations. To train an ITDA, we greedily construct a dictionary of language model activations on a dataset of prompts, selecting those activations which were worst approximated by matching pursuit on the existing dictionary. ITDAs can be trained in just 1% of the time required for SAEs, using 1% of the data. This allowed us to train ITDAs on Llama-3.1 70B and 405B on a single consumer GPU. ITDAs can achieve similar reconstruction performance to SAEs on some target LLMs, but generally incur a performance penalty. However, ITDA dictionaries enable cross-model comparisons, and a simple Jaccard similarity index on ITDA dictionaries outperforms existing methods like CKA, SVCCA, and relative representation similarity metrics. ITDAs provide a cheap alternative to SAEs where computational resources are limited, or when cross model comparisons are necessary. Code available at https://github.com/pleask/itda.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 37 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.

Builds on

37 of 74 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability12 Mar
  2. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing23 Feb
  3. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders9 Dec
  4. 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoders27 Oct
  5. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models17 Oct
  6. 2024Quantifying Feature Space Universality Across Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders9 Oct
  7. 2024Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Models31 Jul
  8. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
  9. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
  10. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders24 Apr
  11. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 26

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  7. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  8. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
  9. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  10. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
  11. 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
  12. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
14 more
  1. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  2. 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 243
  3. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
  4. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
  5. 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 209
  6. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
  7. 2022Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communicationcited by 191
  8. 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
  9. 2020Bridging Mode Connectivity in Loss Landscapes and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 132
  10. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 88
  11. 2024Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Controlcited by 86
  12. 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 43
  13. 2025Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random Transformerscited by 30
  14. 2024Tending Towards Stability: Convergence Challenges in Small Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Beyond Input Activations: Identifying Influential Latents by Gradient Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2026Discovering Millions of Interpretable Features with Sparse Autoencoders
  3. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features
  4. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models
  5. 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations
  6. 2025FaithfulSAE: Towards Capturing Faithful Features with Sparse Autoencoders without External Dataset Dependencies
  7. 2026SharedSAE: One Feature Dictionary Across Language Models
  8. 2025Revisiting End-To-End Sparse Autoencoder Training: A Short Finetune Is All You Need