mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Query Lens: Interpreting Sparse Key-Value Features with Indirect Effects

arXiv 2606.07617 ↗First posted 30 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While sparse autoencoders provide features more interpretable than individual neurons, reliably characterizing them remains challenging. We propose Query Lens, which extends Logit Lens to enable more comprehensive and faithful interpretations of sparse features. By jointly considering encoder-side key features and decoder-side value features, we identify both the inputs that activate a feature and the outputs it promotes. We also account for indirect, module-mediated effects that arise when the feature is processed by downstream modules, going beyond the direct effect captured by Logit Lens. In experiments, we find that Query Lens yields coherent token signatures for features that remain uninterpretable under Logit Lens. Finally, we propose the Subspace Channel Hypothesis, suggesting that downstream modules read features through layer-specific subspaces.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  3. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  5. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
  6. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  7. 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 590
  8. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
  9. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  10. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
  11. 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 190
  12. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
10 more
  1. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
  2. 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
  3. 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
  4. 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 116
  5. 2018Identifying and Controlling Important Neurons in Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
  6. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 106
  7. 2025SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Featurescited by 74
  8. 2024Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-layer Communication in Transformer Language Modelscited by 39
  9. 2025Enhancing Automated Interpretability with Output-Centric Feature Descriptionscited by 39
  10. 2024Backward Lens: Projecting Language Model Gradients into the Vocabulary Spacecited by 30

Built on by

Not cited yet.