Language Models Can Explain Visual Features via Steering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse Autoencoders uncover thousands of features in vision models, yet explaining these features without requiring human intervention remains an open challenge. While previous work has proposed generating correlation-based explanations based on top activating input examples, we present a fundamentally different alternative based on causal interventions. We leverage the structure of Vision-Language Models and steer individual SAE features in the vision encoder after providing an empty image. Then, we prompt the language model to explain what it ``sees'', effectively eliciting the visual concept represented by each feature. Results show that Steering offers an scalable alternative that complements traditional approaches based on input examples, serving as a new axis for automated interpretability in vision models. Moreover, the quality of explanations improves consistently with the scale of the language model, highlighting our method as a promising direction for future research. Finally, we propose Steering-informed Top-k, a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of causal interventions and input-based approaches to achieve state-of-the-art explanation quality without additional computational cost.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.
Builds on
30 of 47 references.
References · 30
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 189
- 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
18 more
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 106
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
- 2024A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 83
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
- 2024SelfIE: Self-Interpretation of Large Language Model Embeddingscited by 63
- 2024A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agentcited by 62
- 2024LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Languagecited by 49
- 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 41
- 2025Enhancing Automated Interpretability with Output-Centric Feature Descriptionscited by 39
- 2024The Missing Curve Detectors of InceptionV1: Applying Sparse Autoencoders to InceptionV1 Early Visioncited by 37
- 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 33
- 2024One-Step is Enough: Sparse Autoencoders for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 30
- 2025Training Language Models to Explain Their Own Computationscited by 27
- 2025Into the Rabbit Hull: From Task-Relevant Concepts in DINO to Minkowski Geometrycited by 26
- 2025How Visual Representations Map to Language Feature Space in Multimodal LLMscited by 24
- 2024Large Multi-modal Models Can Interpret Features in Large Multi-modal Modelscited by 23
- 2025Line of Sight: On Linear Representations in VLLMscited by 6
- 2025Deciphering Functions of Neurons in Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Beyond Interpretability: When, Why, and How Sparse Autoencoders Enable Label-Free Visual Steering
- 2026Logit Lens Supervision for Patch-Level Explanations in Vision-Language Models
- 2025V-SEAM: Visual Semantic Editing and Attention Modulating for Causal Interpretability of Vision-Language Models
- 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
- 2026VisualScratchpad: Inference-time Visual Concepts Analysis in Vision Language Models
- 2026DEX-AR: A Dynamic Explainability Method for Autoregressive Vision-Language Models
- 2023From Wrong To Right: A Recursive Approach Towards Vision-Language Explanation
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding